Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by Liberian_Girl on Sat Sep 19, 2009 3:44 pm




I don’t know what to think anymore…

Looks like two different people to me…
avatar
Liberian_Girl
New Member
New Member

Aantal berichten : 9
Registratiedatum : 2009-09-10
Leeftijd : 37
Woonplaats : Antwerpen, Belgium

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by Guest on Sat Sep 19, 2009 3:55 pm

I`m not going down this road again

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by mjj29081958 on Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:45 pm

Hi Liberian_ Girl!

Sorry, but we can't help you much with that, because we have discussed this issue for loooong time, and now the views on this are divided.

Some of us are confused as well, so don't feel bad about that!

I only can tell you one thing: listen to your heart, make your own mind on this, and try to be patient, time will tell us the truth!!!

Hugs!
avatar
mjj29081958
Silver Member
Silver Member

Aantal berichten : 192
Registratiedatum : 2009-07-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by icy55 on Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:49 am

I read in some other forums where they did a comparison with the scars on his left cheek and below his lips, they matched completely even way back in the 1980s. So O2 MJ is really MJ.
avatar
icy55
Gold Member
Gold Member

Aantal berichten : 347
Registratiedatum : 2009-09-16

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by DreamsComeTrue on Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:55 am

icy55 wrote:I read in some other forums where they did a comparison with the scars on his left cheek and below his lips, they matched completely even way back in the 1980s. So O2 MJ is really MJ.

avatar
DreamsComeTrue
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Aantal berichten : 558
Registratiedatum : 2009-08-11
Leeftijd : 31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by Kuki on Sun Sep 20, 2009 11:34 am

DreamsComeTrue wrote:
icy55 wrote:I read in some other forums where they did a comparison with the scars on his left cheek and below his lips, they matched completely even way back in the 1980s. So O2 MJ is really MJ.


wow you are right!
avatar
Kuki
Gold Member
Gold Member

Aantal berichten : 280
Registratiedatum : 2009-09-04
Leeftijd : 43
Woonplaats : The Netherlands

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by Guest on Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:04 pm

Thats what Ive been telling you Smile
But to be hornest, he didnt look to much like michael to me either at first

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by hungry on Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:07 pm

It's him.
My beliefs have changed Smile
avatar
hungry
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Aantal berichten : 635
Registratiedatum : 2009-08-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by DreamsComeTrue on Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:11 pm

MyBelovedMJ wrote:Thats what Ive been telling you
But to be hornest, he didnt look to much like michael to me either at first

At first I thought the same too! I was actually trying to find photos to proove that that's not Michael! And after analizing many photos, I convinced myself that O2 guy was indeed Michael!
Whatever he did this for, he acted very well!

I'm glad you didn't gave up sweety! Never do that! Michael never did! HUGS
avatar
DreamsComeTrue
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Aantal berichten : 558
Registratiedatum : 2009-08-11
Leeftijd : 31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by Kuki on Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:24 pm

It's him! I cannot believe my eyes, but it's him!
avatar
Kuki
Gold Member
Gold Member

Aantal berichten : 280
Registratiedatum : 2009-09-04
Leeftijd : 43
Woonplaats : The Netherlands

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by GirlInTheMirror1 on Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:26 pm

Good thought Rach! I don´t know, of course it´s possible that it was Michael at the O2 announcement (also if you look at the scars which are the same and so on).
But somehow I have a weird feeling about it, also do the pictures from May, only two months later, look like "before O2" again...



(this picture was March, so the same month, and still different IMO)..

What do you think?
avatar
GirlInTheMirror1
Moderator
Moderator

Aantal berichten : 323
Registratiedatum : 2009-08-01
Woonplaats : Melmac

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by hungry on Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:29 pm

LOL I think he looks the same in every picture now!
I'm sorry, I'm not much help.
avatar
hungry
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Aantal berichten : 635
Registratiedatum : 2009-08-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by ilprincipe on Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:43 pm

The scar is really convincing...but just the scar...

DAMN...I refuse to believe o2 guy is MJ...

why walking like a swagger?!
Why this fugly wig?


I have many other whys about that...But I don't wanna list them all....

Ok..if so -my mind refuses still to believe that- I hope it's just part of the script.....
avatar
ilprincipe
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Aantal berichten : 934
Registratiedatum : 2009-08-04
Leeftijd : 37
Woonplaats : Germany

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by GirlInTheMirror1 on Sun Sep 20, 2009 1:17 pm

ilprincipe wrote:The scar is really convincing...but just the scar...

DAMN...I refuse to believe o2 guy is MJ...

why walking like a swagger?!
Why this fugly wig?


I have many other whys about that...But I don't wanna list them all....

Ok..if so -my mind refuses still to believe that- I hope it's just part of the script.....

I would like you to list them, because I´m still not sure what to believe about that...Smile
avatar
GirlInTheMirror1
Moderator
Moderator

Aantal berichten : 323
Registratiedatum : 2009-08-01
Woonplaats : Melmac

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by nuttybar1964 on Sun Sep 20, 2009 1:24 pm

my gut reaction when i saw him... this isn't him. that walk is different. and his voice, i thought wasn't the same. similiar, but not the same. and he look taller.
but what do i know? need dna testing!!
avatar
nuttybar1964
New Member
New Member

Aantal berichten : 4
Registratiedatum : 2009-09-16

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by ilprincipe on Sun Sep 20, 2009 1:30 pm

*lol*
I'm too lazy right now...I translated this damn BILD-interview from Joe Jackson...that was so much to type and think...

And because of that I just recommend you this vids..you may already know them:

JonellStarTV Hoax Part 2:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdDymH1RBSM&feature=channel_page

and vids from a user of this site called "MauramissesMichael"
Her vids reveal not that much, but they are very entertaining Smile

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtNMc8aCa8A&feature=related

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06nqlCfXoI0

watch and enjoy
avatar
ilprincipe
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Aantal berichten : 934
Registratiedatum : 2009-08-04
Leeftijd : 37
Woonplaats : Germany

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by DreamsComeTrue on Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:58 pm

nuttybar1964 wrote:my gut reaction when i saw him... this isn't him. that walk is different. and his voice, i thought wasn't the same. similiar, but not the same. and he look taller.
but what do i know? need dna testing!!

LMAO!!! This is hilarious! I can't stop laughing!!!
Poor sweety!
I think when he comes back, the first explanation will have to do is about the O2 guy...why/when/who...a serious explanation!!!
avatar
DreamsComeTrue
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Aantal berichten : 558
Registratiedatum : 2009-08-11
Leeftijd : 31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by kdkennedy74 on Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:15 pm

At this point although I still do not believe that was Michael at O2, I have decided that we have enough clues to go on without even considering this anymore. Even his family alone has given us enough to work with.
avatar
kdkennedy74
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Aantal berichten : 836
Registratiedatum : 2009-08-05
Leeftijd : 44

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by the king and I on Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:21 pm

im also very confused.. but his walk is very macho (is he acting?)

mike isnt macho sexy yes but macho?
he is shy
avatar
the king and I
Bronze Member
Bronze Member

Aantal berichten : 66
Registratiedatum : 2009-09-20
Leeftijd : 46
Woonplaats : The Netherlands

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by the king and I on Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:23 pm

i think it was michael at the o2....

look at the way he walks and when he smiles (same theeth)
but he is thinner at the o2

wow mike in a blackhawk



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqYPyxsSH0Y
avatar
the king and I
Bronze Member
Bronze Member

Aantal berichten : 66
Registratiedatum : 2009-09-20
Leeftijd : 46
Woonplaats : The Netherlands

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by annieisnotokey on Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:29 pm

ilprincipe wrote:
Why this fugly wig?

LMAO Fugly wig!!!

avatar
annieisnotokey
Diamond Member
Diamond Member

Aantal berichten : 1751
Registratiedatum : 2009-07-28
Leeftijd : 43
Woonplaats : WPP

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum