Doctors UCLA are idiots?? I don't think so

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Doctors UCLA are idiots?? I don't think so

Post by Souza81 on Sun Sep 27, 2009 5:26 am

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/showbiz/michael_jackson/454405/Bombshell-report-leaves-Michaels-doctor-with-some-tricky-questions-to-answer.html

Now please tell me, who believes that a 'TEAM of doctors' would work
on a dead body that already showed rigor mortis for over an hour just
because some doctor Conrad Murray wants that???? I don't buy that story
at all.

_________________

Souza81
Admin
Admin

Aantal berichten : 259
Registratiedatum : 2009-07-28
Leeftijd : 35

View user profile http://mjkit.forumotion.net

Back to top Go down

Re: Doctors UCLA are idiots?? I don't think so

Post by ishealive on Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:20 am

That is the biggest pile of BS i've ever read, no doctor would continue to work on a dead person just beacuse another doctor pleaded with him to do so.
This story and the story about the nurse coming out to tell (can't remember who)but she told them there's no hope but we'll keep working on him 'til his mother arrives, what kind of rubbish is this.
Doctors, LAPD and LAFD should all be fired for doing an amateur job...

If I ever visit L.A. I hope to god I won't be on deaths door because I won't be getting any help from these people....
avatar
ishealive
Diamond Member
Diamond Member

Aantal berichten : 1183
Registratiedatum : 2009-07-28
Leeftijd : 37
Woonplaats : Ireland

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Doctors UCLA are idiots?? I don't think so

Post by HeavyHearts on Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:30 am

omg murray is so shady :-(
avatar
HeavyHearts
Gold Member
Gold Member

Aantal berichten : 278
Registratiedatum : 2009-09-24

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Doctors UCLA are idiots?? I don't think so

Post by WanaBstartnSthn on Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:41 am

Ok, this is bull and I will tell you exactly why: "Paramedic chiefs and staff at UCLA hospital have revealed to the News of the World details of the report which was overseen by three specialist paramedics". Really? So after Michael Jackson was pronounced "dead", no spokesperson or doctor or anyone @ UCLA would even make a public statement declaring MJ had passed away, Jermaine did it for Christ's sake. So now we're supposed to believe that staff @ UCLA talked to a crap tabloid like News of the World?? Gimme a break! I was born at night but I wasn't born last night!
avatar
WanaBstartnSthn
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Aantal berichten : 645
Registratiedatum : 2009-09-04
Leeftijd : 29

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Doctors UCLA are idiots?? I don't think so

Post by ishealive on Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:52 am

luvmjalways wrote:Ok, this is bull and I will tell you exactly why: "Paramedic chiefs and staff at UCLA hospital have revealed to the News of the World details of the report which was overseen by three specialist paramedics". Really? So after Michael Jackson was pronounced "dead", no spokesperson or doctor or anyone @ UCLA would even make a public statement declaring MJ had passed away, Jermaine did it for Christ's sake. So now we're supposed to believe that staff @ UCLA talked to a crap tabloid like News of the World?? Gimme a break! I was born at night but I wasn't born last night!


Lol brilliant post...
You're dead right they're talking crap, they actually have brown around their mouths from talking BS...

What's sad is people believe this.
avatar
ishealive
Diamond Member
Diamond Member

Aantal berichten : 1183
Registratiedatum : 2009-07-28
Leeftijd : 37
Woonplaats : Ireland

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Doctors UCLA are idiots?? I don't think so

Post by mjssoulmate on Sun Sep 27, 2009 9:01 am

Right. Paramedics spent 42 minutes at house "stabalizing" him, they worked on him in the ambulance, then they spent more than an hour at hospital doing the same. All on someone who was already gone for 2 or more hours? The pic in the ambulance didn't look like someone who had flatlined a long time ago.

BS

And why did the doctors at UCLA not give a formal statement at the time?
avatar
mjssoulmate
Diamond Member
Diamond Member

Aantal berichten : 1043
Registratiedatum : 2009-09-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Doctors UCLA are idiots?? I don't think so

Post by WanaBstartnSthn on Sun Sep 27, 2009 9:03 am

And you know what else, everything in this article is wrong. They list Dr Murray's age as being 51- the same age is Michael. Dr Murray was born in 1953, that would make him 56. What a crock of bull! And I don't appreciate NOTW still referring to Mike as "Jacko". That sh*t irks me real bad. And who is this Terry Harvey? I had never heard about him until this article. I decided to google his name and Michaels name together and couple of articles not from NOTW came up and one was dated from Jul 19 and also lists Harvey as a "family friend". Wonder if he is in on the hoax as well?
avatar
WanaBstartnSthn
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Aantal berichten : 645
Registratiedatum : 2009-09-04
Leeftijd : 29

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Doctors UCLA are idiots?? I don't think so

Post by WanaBstartnSthn on Sun Sep 27, 2009 9:10 am

mjssoulmate wrote:Right. Paramedics spent 42 minutes at house "stabalizing" him, they worked on him in the ambulance, then they spent more than an hour at hospital doing the same. All on someone who was already gone for 2 or more hours? The pic in the ambulance didn't look like someone who had flatlined a long time ago.

BS


Exactly! If he was really dead for "hours", why not just pronounce him dead as soon as he arrived at the hospital? Why waste time working on a dead body while there are LIVE people in the hospital that need the attention?? In my opinion, they really should've sat down and wrote out a script before they just came out with all this nonsense. It sounds like they are making it up as they go along. And in the ambulance pic, if you turn it up right it looks like Michael (or whoever is supposed to be Michael) is kinda smirking or something. He looks like he has some type of expression on his face, not at all like a dead person. And If all the blood went to the back of his body, wouldn't his face be a very pale white? His blood wouldn't have been circulating throughout his entire body anymore so there should be no color. Like someone pointed out, he looks more tanned in that pic than he has in a long time! No offense Michael I love you and you're always beautiful to me! *Kisses* I'm just trying to make a point here!
avatar
WanaBstartnSthn
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Aantal berichten : 645
Registratiedatum : 2009-09-04
Leeftijd : 29

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Doctors UCLA are idiots?? I don't think so

Post by jess.loves.mj on Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:45 am

"But I was told Dr Murray wanted to work on him - he carried on doing CPR and
insisted he needed hospital treatment. He continued giving Michael CPR all
the way to UCLA and even in the emergency room
"

So Murray was the one who worked on him all the way to the hospital? It should be his hands on MJ we can see in the ambulance pic then, should it not?

Hmm... it says:

"Jackson, 50, died from a heart attack after being
given the sedative Propofol, following a cocktail of prescription pills, at
his rented mansion in North Carolwood Drive, Los Angeles.
"

then it says:

"Terry Harvey - a close family friend - backed up the ambulance report, saying:
"Michael died in the house. I spoke to Frank DiLeo - Michael's manager - on
the MORNING of June 25 and he told me that he was dead after a cardiac
arrest. That call is on my phone records.
"


Well which is it? Heart attack or cardiac arrest? They are two very different things!

And if he was dead in the MORNING as that phone call implies, why wait until after lunch to call the ambulance? WTF? If they knew he was dead in the morning (that's what Terry is saying - if MJ's manager knew he was dead, surely CM would have to know) why not call the coroner/ambulance/ANYONE then??


Last edited by jess.loves.mj on Mon Sep 28, 2009 5:22 am; edited 1 time in total
avatar
jess.loves.mj
Silver Member
Silver Member

Aantal berichten : 102
Registratiedatum : 2009-09-06
Leeftijd : 29
Woonplaats : Australia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Doctors UCLA are idiots?? I don't think so

Post by Guest on Mon Sep 28, 2009 5:00 am

Okey, if murray did CPR (wich we all know he suck at comepletely) on michael all the way two the hospital, what is the to peramedics in the ambulance doing then? Cause as far as I can see, they are the ones doing CPR on Michael.

Or mabye Im blind? I need glasses mabye??

This just gets better and better


Last edited by MagicAngel on Mon Sep 28, 2009 7:22 pm; edited 1 time in total

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Doctors UCLA are idiots?? I don't think so

Post by mjssoulmate on Mon Sep 28, 2009 7:05 pm

I thought the kids went to the hospital with Dr. Murray. And why would Murray continue CPR (with gloves on) when there are 4 paramedics?

Frank DeLeo was one of the first people at the hospital, but he was not at the home when it all happened.
avatar
mjssoulmate
Diamond Member
Diamond Member

Aantal berichten : 1043
Registratiedatum : 2009-09-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Doctors UCLA are idiots?? I don't think so

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum