STRANGE AND AMAZING BACK SCREENSHOT...... WHAT DO YOU THINK?

Possible I suppose, I think I am just too afraid to get too optimistic to then be hurt. I am all for the fact of him beeing alive but I fear either for him cause there are reasons that have been debated that suggest he is/was in danger, or either because I fear he wont come back

So Back is basically saying that Michael is dead....imo
I don´t like the comparison to Christ, Michael was human...

With all due respect, but this is the 2nd craziest theory I have heard so far. For one it does state Michael is death (err... this is a death hoax sites so not sure how it fits in here) and 2, since he/she references everything to Christ and biblical prophesy regarding Michael, I'll have to remind them of something and that is the only other Christ to rise up after Jesus Christ himself is the anti-Christ. He is described in biblical terms as someone who will so mimic the actions of Christ himself, that he will deceive some of the very elect (or in another word some believers). This is biblical fact and not me just adding my 2 cents worth in here. So unless you believe Michael to be that (which I know we all don't), then it might be better off using your time to research the facts and not theology. Scripture must always be read and interpreted within it's contents as a whole.

This theory really is a dead end. Sorry.

That was deep.
HMMMM......

Happy Feet wrote:With all due respect, but this is the 2nd craziest theory I have heard so far. For one it does state Michael is death (err... this is a death hoax sites so not sure how it fits in here) and 2, since he/she references everything to Christ and biblical prophesy regarding Michael, I'll have to remind them of something and that is the only other Christ to rise up after Jesus Christ himself is the anti-Christ. He is described in biblical terms as someone who will so mimic the actions of Christ himself, that he will deceive some of the very elect (or in another word some believers). This is biblical fact and not me just adding my 2 cents worth in here. So unless you believe Michael to be that (which I know we all don't), then it might be better off using your time to research the facts and not theology. Scripture must always be read and interpreted within it's contents as a whole.

This theory really is a dead end. Sorry.

just a lil correction it says that if it were possible he would decieve the very elect..matthew 24:24

StayTuned wrote:

Happy Feet wrote:With all due respect, but this is the 2nd craziest theory I have heard so far. For one it does state Michael is death (err... this is a death hoax sites so not sure how it fits in here) and 2, since he/she references everything to Christ and biblical prophesy regarding Michael, I'll have to remind them of something and that is the only other Christ to rise up after Jesus Christ himself is the anti-Christ. He is described in biblical terms as someone who will so mimic the actions of Christ himself, that he will deceive some of the very elect (or in another word some believers). This is biblical fact and not me just adding my 2 cents worth in here. So unless you believe Michael to be that (which I know we all don't), then it might be better off using your time to research the facts and not theology. Scripture must always be read and interpreted within it's contents as a whole.

This theory really is a dead end. Sorry.

just a lil correction it says that if it were possible he would decieve the very elect..matthew 24:24

Yeah that's what I said. Elect are the believers in Christ (and it's not referring to deceiving all the elect). So not sure what your point is.

Happy Feet wrote:

StayTuned wrote:

Happy Feet wrote:With all due respect, but this is the 2nd craziest theory I have heard so far. For one it does state Michael is death (err... this is a death hoax sites so not sure how it fits in here) and 2, since he/she references everything to Christ and biblical prophesy regarding Michael, I'll have to remind them of something and that is the only other Christ to rise up after Jesus Christ himself is the anti-Christ. He is described in biblical terms as someone who will so mimic the actions of Christ himself, that he will deceive some of the very elect (or in another word some believers). This is biblical fact and not me just adding my 2 cents worth in here. So unless you believe Michael to be that (which I know we all don't), then it might be better off using your time to research the facts and not theology. Scripture must always be read and interpreted within it's contents as a whole.

This theory really is a dead end. Sorry.

just a lil correction it says that if it were possible he would decieve the very elect..matthew 24:24

Yeah that's what I said. Elect are the believers in Christ (and it's not referring to deceiving all the elect). So not sure what your point is.

I re-read what I wrote cause I couldn't figure out what you were referring to. I realise I missed out "if it were "possible" he would deceive them. That's what I meant, just didn't type it right. Sorry.

Happy Feet wrote:

Happy Feet wrote:

StayTuned wrote:

Happy Feet wrote:With all due respect, but this is the 2nd craziest theory I have heard so far. For one it does state Michael is death (err... this is a death hoax sites so not sure how it fits in here) and 2, since he/she references everything to Christ and biblical prophesy regarding Michael, I'll have to remind them of something and that is the only other Christ to rise up after Jesus Christ himself is the anti-Christ. He is described in biblical terms as someone who will so mimic the actions of Christ himself, that he will deceive some of the very elect (or in another word some believers). This is biblical fact and not me just adding my 2 cents worth in here. So unless you believe Michael to be that (which I know we all don't), then it might be better off using your time to research the facts and not theology. Scripture must always be read and interpreted within it's contents as a whole.

This theory really is a dead end. Sorry.

just a lil correction it says that if it were possible he would decieve the very elect..matthew 24:24

Yeah that's what I said. Elect are the believers in Christ (and it's not referring to deceiving all the elect). So not sure what your point is.

I re-read what I wrote cause I couldn't figure out what you were referring to. I realise I missed out "if it were "possible" he would deceive them. That's what I meant, just didn't type it right. Sorry.

no need to apologize it was just a simple mistake, i do it too,
smooches!

For some of you who do not know who Back is, this thread should help you: https://mjkit.forumotion.net/michael-s-friends-f63/back-screenshots-t2433-300.htm?sid=d83dd7a65b27d35b729b0473765bd8be. It also has the original theory of 7 that was posted on 6/25/2006, which he referenced in this latest post.

magic wrote:"2 decade long, elaborate planning that culminated in this execution."

WOW!!!!!!!!!

I noticed that too. 20 years ago would be during Bad era when Liberian Girl came out, which may be the reason why pictures from that era and video keep popping up (Memorial, Funeral). That's when he started to plan all of this. Hmmm...

OK..... I dont know why but I´m somehow speechless and also thankful that someone gave an answer to my topic about BACK . I only read your first post until now but WOW thanks..... gotta read the rest of it now. If u are interested in more screenshots of BACK because a lot of them are deleted in the meantime.... just click here: https://mjkit.forumotion.net/michael-s-friends-f63/back-screenshots-t2433-0.htm

and here about the 7-day theory

https://mjkit.forumotion.net/all-odd-things-f8/the-new-7-day-theory-t1486.htm

EDIT: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!! NOW i finally understood that this post IS from BACK himself!!!! oh god sorry.....how embarrassing....

I am sorry I was not on to answer questions... Had a bit of an emergency last night..... However, I don't know how to post the actual screen shot. However it was posted yesterday... I think there are clues in the caps and the spelling....By the way I agree with it being wrong to compare Michael with Jesus, other than to say. I think that Michael attempted to be more "Christ like" which is what we are commanded to do in the new testament.

I just think whoever wrote this is an amazing writer and he is trying to tell us something....
Kathy