Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

by lauren Wed Aug 05, 2009 8:36 am

Yesterday I watched a news program in the UK called Sky News and they got an exclusive tour of the LA Coroner's Office where MJ's 'body' was processed and they took his height and weight etc, but the thing that caught my eye was the LA investagter saying they took the body's fingerprints and sent them to the FBI.If Mj did fake his death and they did send the fingerprints to the FBI would the FBI not notice that the fingerprints givin by MJ back when he was arrested don't match the ones of the body?

Is it normal for a body's fingerprints to be sent to the FBI or did they send the fingerprints to the FBI after the Coroner's Office realised themselves that the prints didn't match?

Here's the link: http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/video/Michael-Jackson-Inside-LA-County-Coroners-Office/Video/200908115353498?lpos=Latest+Video_10&lid=VIDEO_1989926_Jackson%3A+Inside+LA+Coroner

by InnerDemon Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:50 am

I don't think it's normal to send the fingerprints to the FBI Neutral

I think if it's true they must know that they don't match. I can't think of another explaination. But I might be wrong. Does someone know something?

by MJ_Fan_For_40_yrs Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:58 am

where did you find this??

by EarthAngel90 Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:06 am

Amazing Video ... how did you get this ??? and if Michael is gone (which I am praying not) ... will the fake body have wrong finger prints ???

by onemorechance Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:30 pm

Is that Michael's body? So hard to believe.... Sad

by ballongiraf Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:35 pm

InnerDemon wrote:I don't think it's normal to send the fingerprints to the FBI I think if it's true they must know that they don't match. I can't think of another explaination. But I might be wrong. Does someone know something?

could be why the autopsy results are delayed.....

by curiousgirl Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:37 pm

why would they feel the need to take his fingerprints??
unless it's NOT Micheal

by yaya Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:39 pm

to me, this is one of the most drastic turns this story has taken! i just wonder what's next! hopefully something to the effect of them finding out it's not even michael's body What a Face

by InnerDemon Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:46 pm

yaya wrote:to me, this is one of the most drastic turns this story has taken! i just wonder what's next! hopefully something to the effect of them finding out it's not even michael's body

And that would just tell us that Keisha IS reliable. But hopefully? I better not be proofed right, cause then all hell will break loose and the hunting after Michael begins again Shocked

It's alright for me to never know as long as he is safe bounce

by ballongiraf Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:49 pm

what exactly did Keisha say? I never got to read the "good news" thread....

by yaya Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:54 pm

InnerDemon wrote:
yaya wrote:to me, this is one of the most drastic turns this story has taken! i just wonder what's next! hopefully something to the effect of them finding out it's not even michael's body

And that would just tell us that Keisha IS reliable. But hopefully? I better not be proofed right, cause then all hell will break loose and the hunting after Michael begins again It's alright for me to never know as long as he is safe

hey, that reminds me of liza minelli's statement about all hell breaking loose. i'm waiting for the time to come when it can be applied to the story. i know there are some crazy people out there who will travel the globe and spend millions of dollars looking for michael...but i agree with you; i'm perfectly content in just knowing he's alive and well.

by InnerDemon Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:55 pm

ballongiraf wrote:what exactly did Keisha say? I never got to read the "good news" thread....

I explained it here: https://mjkit.forumotion.net/michael-jackson-hoax-death-theories-f2/just-curious-t55.htm

But Im actually referring to her theory. She stated that the coroner has the corpse of an imposter of Michael and they are still trying to find out what killed that person and how it can be that it doesnt seem to be Michael. And how theyre gonna tell the public without becoming the biggest joke ever

@yaya
me too.. I wanna know what she means, that statement makes me crazy albino

by lauren Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:38 pm

MJ_Fan_For_40_yrs wrote:where did you find this??

i found it on the sky news website ( a news program in the uk )

by Mo Wed Aug 05, 2009 2:17 pm

Sorry, but to make sure everybody understands:

The narrater says at 2.00: Then, LA County procedure is to fingerprint the body.

by annieisnotokey Wed Aug 05, 2009 2:35 pm

Mo wrote:Sorry, but to make sure everybody understands:

The narrater says at 2.00: Then, LA County procedure is to fingerprint the body.

I agree, but... the procedure is to fingerprint the body:
* for record purposes?
* to confirm identity?

It is not the same to just fingerprint the body to keep them in the autopsy records than to fingerprint the body and use those fingerprints to check for identity.

For example, a few years ago my car was stolen by 2 people to run away from a crime they'd comitted. I got fingerprinted to rule my fingerprints out when the police recovered the car. BUT my fingerprints were not checked against fingerprints on file to check if I was the person who¡I said I was. Clearly, they can fingerprint you and yet not check for identity.

I wonder if in MJ's case the fingerprints were just taken from the body OR were also checked for identity... Suspect

by QUEEN Wed Aug 05, 2009 2:40 pm

lauren wrote:Yesterday I watched a news program in the UK called Sky News and they got an exclusive tour of the LA Coroner's Office where MJ's 'body' was processed and they took his height and weight etc, but the thing that caught my eye was the LA investagter saying they took the body's fingerprints and sent them to the FBI. Now if they sent the fingerprints to the FBI would the FBI not notice that the fingerprints givin by MJ back when he was arrested don't match the ones of the body?

Is it normal for a body's fingerprints to be sent to the FBI or did they send the fingerprints to the FBI after the Coroner's Office realised themselves that the prints didn't match?

Here's the link: [url=http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/video/Michael-Jackson-Inside-LA-County-Coroners-Office/Video/200908115353498?lpos=Latest+Video_10&lid=VIDEO_1989926_Jackson%3A+Inside+LA+Coroner

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/video/Michael-Jackson-Inside-LA-County-Coroners-Office/Video/200908115353498?lpos=Latest+Video_10&lid=VIDEO_1989926_Jackson%3A+Inside+LA+Coroner[/quote[/url]]

This is what Keisha was saying, it was a double, if they send it to the F.B I it's becuase it was a double, they need more info.

by PepaBCN Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:04 pm

Mo wrote:Sorry, but to make sure everybody understands:

The narrater says at 2.00: Then, LA County procedure is to fingerprint the body.

But does he say if sending them to FBI is included in that procedure? Surprised

by Mo Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:16 pm

PepaBCN wrote:
Mo wrote:Sorry, but to make sure everybody understands:

The narrater says at 2.00: Then, LA County procedure is to fingerprint the body.

But does he say if sending them to FBI is included in that procedure?

Here's the complete text:

Then, LA County procedure is to fingerprint the body, however famous the deceased. They will be taken up to the machine and all of this is basically is an inkless laser system. They run the finger over it and it will capture the print image. Once it's gets that on screen and he's captured it he'll send it on to ??? in Sacramento - the FBI.

Sounds like a standard procedure to me.

by aimee Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:31 pm

Mo wrote:
PepaBCN wrote:
Mo wrote:Sorry, but to make sure everybody understands:

The narrater says at 2.00: Then, LA County procedure is to fingerprint the body.

But does he say if sending them to FBI is included in that procedure?

Here's the complete text:

Then, LA County procedure is to fingerprint the body, however famous the deceased. They will be taken up to the machine and all of this is basically is an inkless laser system. They run the finger over it and it will capture the print image. Once it's gets that on screen and he's captured it he'll send it on to ??? in Sacramento - the FBI.

Sounds like a standard procedure to me.

ok so its standard procedure, but if michael faked his death and its a bodydouble lying there would the FBI not of realised that the fingerprints of the body dont match mj's fingerprints when he was arrested back in 2003?

by Silence Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:41 pm

maybe they took the fingerprints to make sure there was NO HOAX.

with a superstar like Mj I understand that completely

by MJJXscape Wed Aug 05, 2009 5:28 pm

IMO, the fingerprints story is a speculation. To identify MJ's body, coroner just needs to perform DNA test on MJ's body and compare it to DNA of MJ that LAPD has in their data base. They have his DNA I believe since 1993 or 2003, when allegations of child molestation started!

by happytomato Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:54 pm

MJJXscape wrote:IMO, the fingerprints story is a speculation. To identify MJ's body, coroner just needs to perform DNA test on MJ's body and compare it to DNA of MJ that LAPD has in their data base. They have his DNA I believe since 1993 or 2003, when allegations of child molestation started!

did they compare the dna?

by MJJXscape Thu Aug 06, 2009 6:49 pm

happytomato wrote:
MJJXscape wrote:IMO, the fingerprints story is a speculation. To identify MJ's body, coroner just needs to perform DNA test on MJ's body and compare it to DNA of MJ that LAPD has in their data base. They have his DNA I believe since 1993 or 2003, when allegations of child molestation started!

did they compare the dna?

Only coroner knows this. Knowing that MJ had so many impersonators, coroner most likely did DNA test on MJ's body to see if that was MJ. I'm sure it was Michael's body because of big investigation started and so many agencies involved.

by KEISHA7 Thu Aug 06, 2009 6:52 pm

MJJXscape wrote:
happytomato wrote:
MJJXscape wrote:IMO, the fingerprints story is a speculation. To identify MJ's body, coroner just needs to perform DNA test on MJ's body and compare it to DNA of MJ that LAPD has in their data base. They have his DNA I believe since 1993 or 2003, when allegations of child molestation started!

did they compare the dna?

Only coroner knows this. Knowing that MJ had so many impersonators, coroner most likely did DNA test on MJ's body to see if that was MJ. I'm sure it was Michael's body because of big investigation started and so many agencies involved.

IT WASN'T mj's body !
When you have money you can buy anything in AMERICA.

by STARbaybeeRoqk Thu Aug 06, 2009 7:02 pm

aimee wrote:
Mo wrote:
PepaBCN wrote:
Mo wrote:Sorry, but to make sure everybody understands:

The narrater says at 2.00: Then, LA County procedure is to fingerprint the body.

But does he say if sending them to FBI is included in that procedure?

Here's the complete text:

Then, LA County procedure is to fingerprint the body, however famous the deceased. They will be taken up to the machine and all of this is basically is an inkless laser system. They run the finger over it and it will capture the print image. Once it's gets that on screen and he's captured it he'll send it on to ??? in Sacramento - the FBI.

Sounds like a standard procedure to me.

ok so its standard procedure, but if michael faked his death and its a bodydouble lying there would the FBI not of realised that the fingerprints of the body dont match mj's fingerprints when he was arrested back in 2003?

okay lol
about the fingerprints....its standard procedure im guessing to take fingerprints...basically only if they THINK for a certain reason that the body is the body that belongs to the name of someone like for example a person named Weston Nightengale then the fingerprints that was sent off to the FBI will be scanned and checked to see if its a match
we dont even kno for sure if the coroner thinks that The body is or isnt michaels body but they send the fingerprints to FBI reguardless im guessing...other than that...thats it lol
do you understand?

by STARbaybeeRoqk Thu Aug 06, 2009 7:04 pm

i mean isnt the body of the name that belongs to someone

by MJJXscape Thu Aug 06, 2009 7:08 pm

KEISHA7 wrote:
MJJXscape wrote:
happytomato wrote:
MJJXscape wrote:IMO, the fingerprints story is a speculation. To identify MJ's body, coroner just needs to perform DNA test on MJ's body and compare it to DNA of MJ that LAPD has in their data base. They have his DNA I believe since 1993 or 2003, when allegations of child molestation started!

did they compare the dna?

Only coroner knows this. Knowing that MJ had so many impersonators, coroner most likely did DNA test on MJ's body to see if that was MJ. I'm sure it was Michael's body because of big investigation started and so many agencies involved.

IT WASN'T mj's body !
When you have money you can buy anything in AMERICA.

Yes, you can buy anything in US...but in this investigation involved too many agencies, insurance companies, government agencies, too many people, people's lives and their careers put on line. There is no way that is possible to buy all country just to pull this type of hoax.
If Michael ever wanted to pull this hoax, he would do it in different way without all this mess, and I'm sure he wouldn't want to toss away the opportunity to show to his kids his performance At O2 arena, and maybe after some concerts to pull this hoax. But I just don't believe he ever wanted to do such thing and put his family trough this court mess.

Michael liked his privacy, but he liked to be in center of attention also, he liked publicity and was very good at PR, very creative and used to come up with such amazing ideas like surgical mask, band-aides on his mouth, tapes on his fingers, military jackets, withe glove, and more stuff.

by dunno_it Thu Aug 06, 2009 7:14 pm

so the DNA test results are going to be our final proof whether it was or wasn't a hoax, right? And, if the DNA is not that of MJ's they surly are going to make it public! Neutral

by Guest Thu Aug 06, 2009 7:30 pm

No matter what, this can still all be BS.

They dont have to do a DNA test on the body, they already have Michaels DNA from the trials.

And could you please tell me one thing.
How many times are they going to put, him in his casket to take him out again, to do more tests.??
I just dont believe it.
And yes, you can buy EVERYTHING In the US. Noone knows, wether or not real Doctors have been involved in this.
About his family, Michael wouldent hurt them, no you are right about that, but from my point of view none of them, seem to be hurt. NO TEARS!! HUH??
they are NOT going to tell the public, if the body isent Michaels, like i said, they can use his DNA from the trials.

This is all BS, they should have done a DNA test right away.

When i see a realible death satificate sigend BY A DOCTOR I will believe it..

Until then.. NOWAY

by emo_pinkt Thu Aug 06, 2009 7:35 pm

Shouldnt the finger print and DNA be sent to analized as soon as he's dead...it being standard procedure and all? Why are they doing it 6 weeks later? Or are they not?

by MJJXscape Thu Aug 06, 2009 7:39 pm

MyBelovedMJ wrote:No matter what, this can still all be BS.

They dont have to do a DNA test on the body, they already have Michaels DNA from the trials.

And could you please tell me one thing.
How many times are they going to put, him in his casket to take him out again, to do more tests.??
I just dont believe it.
And yes, you can buy EVERYTHING In the US. Noone knows, wether or not real Doctors have been involved in this.
About his family, Michael wouldent hurt them, no you are right about that, but from my point of view none of them, seem to be hurt. NO TEARS!! HUH??
they are NOT going to tell the public, if the body isent Michaels, like i said, they can use his DNA from the trials.

This is all BS, they should have done a DNA test right away.

When i see a realible death satificate sigend BY A DOCTOR I will believe it..

Until then.. NOWAY

If coroner wants to confirm if the body was MJ, then he does need do DNA test from the body TO COMPARE it with DNA from the Michael's files that LAPD has from his trial.
In order to do any more tests they don't need his body, they already have some body tissues from the 1-st autopsy.

by Guest Thu Aug 06, 2009 8:04 pm

So bee it.

I still dont believe it.

I wanna see a death satificate signed by a doctor

by STARbaybeeRoqk Thu Aug 06, 2009 8:26 pm

who ever mentioned about the grave your totally right all this is BS, if not its just retarded
becasue on youtube i just watched a video of Randy driving to Forest Lawn to visit michaels grave and it was like a real video...idk if the media just wants to make michaels name bad or people want to keep him n the publicity or whatever the reason is....You Can Smell Lies In The Air!

by Sponsored content

Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?

Re: Michael's fingerprints sent to the FBI?