INTERESTING !

Chernoff says he needs to know precisely what levels of various drugs were detected and said the failure to release the report seemed like "gamesmanship."

Chernoff says his client was truthful with investigators and the general findings made public support statements the doctor gave investigators after Jackson's June 25 death.

if his client has been truthful and the general findings supports the doctor's statements, then why the need to know the exact levels of various drugs? One would asume that Murray would know that?

Oh settle down, BBC has got your back! :p Also 'gamesmanship'? Interesting choice of words.

Yeah thats a very interesting word to use.

Have we ever seen a picture or video of that lawyer? Wouldn't he be out and about and get asked by the press about Murray all the time? Does he even exist, too?

DONNALOVESMJ wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090828/ap_on_en_mu/us_michael_jackson_autopsy

Thank you for posting this! I do believe with my heart that MJ is alive and that all that is going on including statements that the LAPD is dong investigations and all, is all part if the Hoax! WHy not release all the findings in the report and only give us half of it? IMHO they will be releasing the reports in parts because they need to keep our MIchael's name out there on the headlines I'm not trying to souns cynical but is just my thougt! Even the lawyer states is a "gamesmanship."

gamesmanship....
what does that mean? Explain it to the poor danish gal....

InnerDemon wrote:Have we ever seen a picture or video of that lawyer? Wouldn't he be out and about and get asked by the press about Murray all the time? Does he even exist, too?

Excellent point, I've never seen him. He only ever releases these statements. Kind of like a P.R. guy to the stars...

didnt we see dude in a television interview a few days after MJ "died"?

ballongiraf wrote:gamesmanship....
what does that mean? Explain it to the poor danish gal....

its like using tactical ways to sort of manipulate someone's position on something. I hope I explained it well and didn't confuse you?

Banessa wrote:

ballongiraf wrote:gamesmanship....
what does that mean? Explain it to the poor danish gal....

its like using tactical ways to sort of manipulate someone's position on something. I hope I explained it well and didn't confuse you?

sorta, kinda like fooling the enemy?

ballongiraf wrote:

Banessa wrote:

ballongiraf wrote:gamesmanship....
what does that mean? Explain it to the poor danish gal....

its like using tactical ways to sort of manipulate someone's position on something. I hope I explained it well and didn't confuse you?

sorta, kinda like fooling the enemy?

I knew I didn't explain myself right because it was even confusing to me after I posted it! Sorry about that. I guess what the lawyer is saying is that the half of the report that has been release is the half that incriminates their client Murray. In other words they maybe doing this to give more blame to Murray and to have more people point at Murray as the sole Culprit. It's like they are manipulating the results so the blame falls on Murray only! Makes sense

gamesmanship: the art of winning games by using various ploys and tactics to gain a psychological advantage. according to my mac dictionary

thanks i think i understand now