Rabbi shmulley's book, back cover pic is IMPOSSIBLE!!!!! major clue

The back cover of Rabbi Shmulley's Michael Jackson tapes book is a fake. I verified by listening on you tube to the interview rabbi gave msnbc june 26th 2009. Rabbi clearly states in this interview that he had not spoken to MJ in years mentionning their friendship had come to an end many years ago. Now look closely at the pic on the back cover of the book, in the background on the pic we can see Paris isn't she pretty looking exactly the way we have always seen her. PROBLEM!!! many years ago there is no way Paris looked like that, we are talking about an 11 year old child and we all know how kids are constantly changing. We all know Paris had to look much younger YEARS ago. Therefore, if Rabbi and Michael would have taken a recent pic together for the book there would be at some point some speaking involved. Then I thought it could be photoshopped, great theory right? NO WOULD BE A STUPID THING TO DO FOR THE RABBI. He would obviously compromise he credibility and ultimately hurt his sales. Who would want to buy a book that is supposed to reveal nothing but the truth but yet there is a lie on the back cover of the book. Either they speak and have some sort of relationship or they dont speak and dont hang out!!! HELLOOOO. It is so obvious all this sloppyness in regards to a lot of things and events surrounding this whole "MJ death" are intentionnal. My 11 year old would know better than to put such a pic on the back cover of this book. Please leave your comments on this.

I just looked at it on Amazon and I'm pretty sure that isn't Paris...sorry.

Sorry but that's not Paris. The person on the cover looks older than Paris does now.
Besides, I don't know how involved in this hoax the Rabbi would be considering the things he has said about MJ. On on hand he said he wants people to see the man behind the icon but on the other hand, the way he is interpreting his words is twisted and is contradicting what MJ is saying. He doesn't seem to be in this for anything else but the money.

No, that is not Paris. It could Mark Lester's daughter, though.

Ok... well could someone get a pic on here or a link to a pic of mark lester's daughter about 8 years ago plz. Thank you all for your comments.

Even though I'm pretty much convinced that the Rabbi's "tapes" are NOT from 9 years ago, (I'm reading the book and everything sounds so eerie, as if it was recorded and written within the last 12 months) the pic on the back cover resembles Paris, yet is far too old to be her now.

Well hype we see eye to eye on one thing, I do not believe the tapes are 9 years old either and his book contradicts a few things that I have read so far in comparison to Randy J. Taraborelli's biography. I also read unmasked but I wont use anything in it to compare stories because I dont trust the author, sure dont send me the vibe of honesty. http://static1.purepeople.com/articles/0/37/40/0/@/262561-paris-jackson-637x0-2.jpg Check out this link and compare, I still feel there is a good possibility it could be her. Who knows maybe they made her look a little older somehow.

Jenn,
Judging for them pic you posted, who knows? It could be Paris in the book photo. If it is indeed her, it will definitely prove that those tapes aren't as old as we are being led to believe.

Hype: Thank you for at least considering it to be possible. I always seem to get negative comments about my observations and it gets frustrating! I spend a lot of time checking every theory I come up with. Anyway ty.

Love

@Jenn

Check your PM's....

This is not Paris in the backgroud, it's a woman, an adult, look :

I don't think it's Paris and I'm not sure that it's represented to be her.

I dont think they wanted to emphasize it was paris, could have been a type of clue that is right in front of our faces waiting to see if anyone will pick up on it.

Anyway, nobody thinks it could be paris so I guess I must be wrong.

I dont think I will post in the forum anymore, I dont think like most of you and that is why we never seem to agree. I must be the odd ball! lol

I still love this site and will keep reading, only will keep my opinions to myself. You guys are great and keep the posts on all topics coming, I love to read them.

Jenn77

jenn77 wrote:I dont think I will post in the forum anymore, I dont think like most of you and that is why we never seem to agree. I must be the odd ball! lol

I still love this site and will keep reading, only will keep my opinions to myself. You guys are great and keep the posts on all topics coming, I love to read them.

Jenn77

No it's ok to post what you think Jenn77.

I posted many things where people don't agree and it's ok. I think it's why we're all here, to give our ideas, and then , see what the others think about it.

Don't take it personally please ok, and still post please

Just because people have differences of opinion does not mean you are an "odd ball" as you state. I think the differences of opinions are what make this site great and the give and take is what makes it interesting.

I don't think that anyone is disgreeing with you in a negative way and no need to "guess I must be wrong" -- maybe you're right and the rest of us are wrong! So please don't stop posting and keep opinions to yourself just because you may see things in a different light. I don't get the sense that this is a "majority rules" forum but rather an interesting exchange of ideas and theories.

...IMHO

Thank you guys for the encouragement it is very nice on your part. I guess the reason I am considering not posting anymore is because it is upsetting when you spend hours verifying your theory with pics, articles, youtube, to see that you are perhaps the only one with that belief or the only one who can see it. When I post I hope for some kind of approval, I guess for some kind of validation to my theories.

I am having a kinda blahh day, probably what is wrong with me. Again thank you for your kindness.

jenn77 wrote:I dont think I will post in the forum anymore, I dont think like most of you and that is why we never seem to agree. I must be the odd ball! lol

I still love this site and will keep reading, only will keep my opinions to myself. You guys are great and keep the posts on all topics coming, I love to read them.

Jenn77

Please dont stop posting..No one here knows who could be right and the end of the day, till we get proof until we get it we must keep posting ideas as thats what leads us to the substantial finds, people will disagree all the time but we'l never no anything if we stop sharing... just for the record i dont think its paris but i do think that photo is more recent of mj..

I don't think that it is Paris either, but don't stop posting. You could be right and all of us could be wrong. All of us here differ from what most others believe. We believe that he is alive. Only time will tell who's opinions and posts are right and who's are wrong, but we all need to stick together and never give up.

I should have said that I really studied the pic when you brought it up and I can see why one might think that it is Paris -- there is some resemblance there. So I didn't automatically dismiss your thought(s).

I just didn't see it to be her once I studied it -- it seemed to be an older woman. Also, Schmuley doesn't wear glasses these days (he must have upgraded to contacts, LOL) so I am assuming that the pictures was taken at least a few years ago and therefore "Paris" was too old to be in that photo. On the other hand, who knows?

Again, I don't think that you should be discouraged at all and feel that something is wrong with you. I think that we are all overloaded on info and looking at things with the thought of finding something. I, myself, don't even know what to think anymore about this whole MJ business -- there is just too much that is out of place and strange. I've had to remove myself from the computer for the last 2 days because of the constant forum watching, youtube, etc. just to sort of regroup -- it's too taxing sometimes and I just needed a break.

So again, don't be discouraged and feel that you shouldn't post anymore. I should have clarified that I did indeed give your post consideration before I replied -- it wasn't quick and out-of-hand. I'm sorry that you felt that I might have "dismissed" your work too quickly.

Ok.. Ok.. I get the point.

Now PLEASE stop sending me messages of apology or encouragement to keep posting. I feel like I am receiving pity and absolutely do not want that, I am sorry that you guys felt that you had to all write me encouragement notes. I know that you all meant well I KNOW However I dont like to get much attention.

So lets not bring this up anymore we are all good I love you guys here and apreciate your friendly concern. Maybe I will post again in the futur.

NOW PLEASE, NO MORE TALK ABOUT THIS, LIKE IT NEVER HAPPENED!!

The rabbi also used a picture of a wax figure.Madame Tussaud

I have a funny feeling about rabbi, he dont seem genuinly honest or bending the truths, dunno cant explain it. Like I believe I've said before stuff in his book contradicts stuff in Randy J. Taraborelli's biography wich has been around for quite a while now. Has anyone heard anything about MJ dissmissing anything in Taraborelli's biography?

I haven't read the book yet, I'm waiting for a copy from my local library because I don't want to give my money to this man but I do want to read it so that I can draw my own conclusions. i should have it in about a week or so.

From what I have seen of this man on TV, I don't get a good vibe from him. He keeps saying that Michael wanted this information that he is now presenting to be shown to the world. This was supposed to have been done back in in 2002/2003 sometime but because of the 2nd set of allegations he couldn't. He claims that the focus was supposed to be on helping children/family and that under the circumstances it wasn't the right time for the book to come out.

I have read the most recent version of the Taraborelli bio -- I haven't read anything anywhere else that Michael dismisses anything in his book.

The rabbi, I don't get a good feeling about. It has also been circulated on the net that he has been in some trouble of his own and supposedly "mispent" money of the charity that he and Michael started. I've even read somewhere that he was thrown out of his synagogue for similar reasons. Personally, I don't get a warm and fuzzy feeling about him -- it seems that he is just out make a buck.

From the tapes that have been revealed on TV, I find it a bit difficult that these were things that Michael really wanted to put "out there" for general consumption.

I guess I will have to make up my mind about this once I read the book and not just base my current opionions from the interviews that I've seen on TV.

Is there anything specific in the book that contradicts things that have been otherwise presented about MJ as a whole?

Human_nature wrote:This is not Paris in the backgroud, it's a woman, an adult, look :

No. I agree with everyone...its not here...very similar to her though.

In response to citygal,

The 1st thing is that he says their freindship ended because Rabbi couldn't be around him and self destruct so he cut himself out of his life. On the other hand, I read somewhere on the net that Michael ended their friendship because Rabbi stole money from the charity they started up together. The other thing I am uncertain about is that Taraborelli states in his book that Michael bleached his skin because of the vitiligo and that MJ was the one that fabricated and leaked to the press the story of the elephant man bones. Shmulley on the other hand, in the conversations MJ answers that those things are false, a rumor. Just dont know if we can belive anyone anymore.

Actually, I saw an interview with a reporter from "the Enquirer" (I know an excellent news source, not!) but he also claimed that the elephant man bones and hyperbaric chamber stories came from Jackson's camp directly -- that they actually called to give those stories to them. Supposedly Michael believed that any publicity, even if it wasn't "good" was better than no publicity at all. Also, Liz was always in "The Enquirer" and he wanted them to cover him as much as they did her.

I'm with you -- who knows what to believe or not anymore. That's why I feel like my head is going to explode. I guess it's safe to say that we will never really know the truth, at least that's what I think.

I heard more then once that all the strange stuff about MJ..........Elephant Man's bones, the Hyperbaric Chamber and maybe one or two other WERE leaked by MJ's people with MJ's permission.......to get publicity.

Who knows what's true or not.

The story about the  Hyperbaric Chamber came from Michael .Charles Montgomery from the Enquier was the one with the news about the hyperbaric chamber.P.T Barnum all the way.. and the rest is history.Ive got it from Tarraborelli's book.( Its really the very first crazy story about Michael Jackson)

oh forgot something..The picture on the front of the book is a wax figure from Tussauds.

silvy wrote:oh forgot something..The picture on the front of the book is a wax figure from Tussauds.

Which book?

the rabbi book of mj's tapes. However it is probably not her cause I am the only one who thinks that. I must need glasses! lol

I'm beginning to think I'm going to have to buy this book instead of waiting to get from the library -- I'm going to have to spend much time with it for interpretation purposes.

Sigh, I really didn't want to put money in this guy's pocket.

Even if I dont think much of shmulley, there is something that dont sit right with me. Not really any major things but.... dunno how to say it.... just get a funny vibe from it, that it is revealing of something more than mj's soul... maybe I spend too much time thinking about all this... going COOCOO....LOL