3 Faces of Michael: Part V

Oh my. Well, I must say, this theory definitely gets points for originality. It almost reads out as a psychologlically disturbed 'thriller', no pun intended.

Tell me, besides the obivious inspiration from the 1950 movie/book, do you have any real evidence that this might be the case for Mr. M. Jackson?

@GirlSaturday...you had been asking about format ....I have an idea...this is the only way I know off the top of my head and if this isn't something you choose to do, I'd personally still appreciate your doing something to make it easier to read them all in order because I still have to hunt down part III and don't know where to look.

If I had more time on my hands I'd just relax and hunt it up and may be able to later, but meanwhile, if you like this idea then you could try it.
If not, that's cool, its just my two cents worth of a try to help.

Since yours is more or less a "triology" of sorts ...I'm thinking its possible that you could post all five links in one thread, that way all we have to do is click link by link.

It would look a bit like:

Part 1 https://mjkit.forumotion.net/michael-jackson-hoax-death-theories-f2/3-faces-of-michael-part-v-t1300.htm#33410

Part II https://mjkit.forumotion.net/michael-jackson-hoax-death-theories-f2/3-faces-of-michael-part-v-t1300.htm#33410

Part III https://mjkit.forumotion.net/michael-jackson-hoax-death-theories-f2/3-faces-of-michael-part-v-t1300.htm#33410

Etc. ..

How:

1. Go to File
2. Open New Tab
3. Go to this forum (MJHD Backup Forum) in the New blank window
4. Go directly to this thread we're in right now and while in this thread in click on Edit (to edit your post).
5. Minimize the screen half way so that it's half the size of the monitor screen.
6. Come back to this original screen.
7. Minimize it also, so that both this screen and the new screen are side by side.
7. Go up to the address bar and Select (by clicking one time so the address window turns blue.
8. (then right click) Copy
9. Go back to your New Window to your Edit screen and Paste
10.Come back to this original board and pull up each of your posts and repeat the same process for each thread you have each installment in, in the order you want them to be read.
11.Label each one by typing to the left of your "paste job":
Part I
Part II ... etc. that way, there will be labels for each link.

All links will be active when you click submit on your newly edited thread.

Or, you could do it the other way around. It doesn't matter which window you use for copying and which you use for pasting.

Either way should reap the same result.

Someone else may know a shorter cut, but that is my two cents.

I do apologize profusely if I have given you a bunch of something you already know or if I have oversimplified these explanations as I have no way of knowing what you already know and its my only way of knowing that I'm being as clear as I know how.

If you'd rather not go through all that, it is fine with me also. Again, just my two cents.

If you have any questions ask on this thread b/c my PM is acting up.

@littleEARTHQUAKE, defintely agree ... SG definitely gets an A + for imagination! I'm so impressed by that alone... I mean....whoever woulda thoughtta this

Riveting SG .. just riveting.

GirlSaturday,
This is a great theory. I love your reference to the 3 faces of Eve. I remember seeing the movie on AMC. It also had me thinking outside of the box. Keep the Faith!

Thank you! I have always had a fascination with psychology. That is one of the many reasons why I joined this site.

EarthAngel90 wrote:Bravo , GirlSaturday - I never been so interested in something - love the theory - Making me Think Way outside the box .... Love It. ( I love "Three Faces of Eve" Reference - I had a project last year on that movie for Pyschology & I did the project but Love the Movie as well !!!!)

Thank you. As you can tell, the movie left quite an impression with me as well.

Sweet1 wrote:GirlSaturday,
This is a great theory. I love your reference to the 3 faces of Eve. I remember seeing the movie on AMC. It also had me thinking outside of the box. Keep the Faith!

Thanks for the feedback. Unfortunately I didn't see your post before I submitted the theory.

BTW - My imagination is quite scary sometimes...

Red Velvet wrote:@GirlSaturday...you had been asking about format ....I have an idea...this is the only way I know off the top of my head and if this isn't something you choose to do, I'd personally still appreciate your doing something to make it easier to read them all in order because I still have to hunt down part III and don't know where to look.

If I had more time on my hands I'd just relax and hunt it up and may be able to later, but meanwhile, if you like this idea then you could try it.
If not, that's cool, its just my two cents worth of a try to help.

Since yours is more or less a "triology" of sorts ...I'm thinking its possible that you could post all five links in one thread, that way all we have to do is click link by link.

It would look a bit like:

Part 1 https://mjkit.forumotion.net/michael-jackson-hoax-death-theories-f2/3-faces-of-michael-part-v-t1300.htm#33410

Part II https://mjkit.forumotion.net/michael-jackson-hoax-death-theories-f2/3-faces-of-michael-part-v-t1300.htm#33410

Part III https://mjkit.forumotion.net/michael-jackson-hoax-death-theories-f2/3-faces-of-michael-part-v-t1300.htm#33410

Etc. ..

How:

1. Go to File
2. Open New Tab
3. Go to this forum (MJHD Backup Forum) in the New blank window
4. Go directly to this thread we're in right now and while in this thread in click on Edit (to edit your post).
5. Minimize the screen half way so that it's half the size of the monitor screen.
6. Come back to this original screen.
7. Minimize it also, so that both this screen and the new screen are side by side.
7. Go up to the address bar and Select (by clicking one time so the address window turns blue.
8. (then right click) Copy
9. Go back to your New Window to your Edit screen and Paste
10.Come back to this original board and pull up each of your posts and repeat the same process for each thread you have each installment in, in the order you want them to be read.
11.Label each one by typing to the left of your "paste job":
Part I
Part II ... etc. that way, there will be labels for each link.

All links will be active when you click submit on your newly edited thread.

Or, you could do it the other way around. It doesn't matter which window you use for copying and which you use for pasting.

Either way should reap the same result.

Someone else may know a shorter cut, but that is my two cents.

I do apologize profusely if I have given you a bunch of something you already know or if I have oversimplified these explanations as I have no way of knowing what you already know and its my only way of knowing that I'm being as clear as I know how.

If you'd rather not go through all that, it is fine with me also. Again, just my two cents.

If you have any questions ask on this thread b/c my PM is acting up.

@littleEARTHQUAKE, defintely agree ... SG definitely gets an A + for imagination! I'm so impressed by that alone... I mean....whoever woulda thoughtta this

Riveting SG .. just riveting.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. No I do not have evidence that this actually took place. I only rely on my first instincts...my gut feelings.

Since June 25th, I have been obsessed over Michael. That is quite unusual for me. I have read several books and articles about him since his "death" and found him to be someone that is a ball of contradictions. He has many extremes. The best way that I could wrap my brain around those contradictions is that there may have been more than one person inside of his body. It seemed to be much more than the normal mood swings that we all experience. When I started writing my theory, I also watched interviews and saw that different people were present depending on the subject matter and questions that he was asked, It was a very spooky to witness this.

littleEARTHQUAKE wrote:Oh my. Well, I must say, this theory definitely gets points for originality. It almost reads out as a psychologlically disturbed 'thriller', no pun intended.

Tell me, besides the obivious inspiration from the 1950 movie/book, do you have any real evidence that this might be the case for Mr. M. Jackson?

Do you remember the 60 minutes interview in 2003,with Ed Bradley. Remember when Michael says "That's not Michael Jackson, I'm sorry. That was someone else" See the transcript of the interview, almost at the end. Do you think this bolsters your theory. I always thought that was an odd remark, and wondered what he meant.

http://www.allmichaeljackson.com/interviews/cbs60mins.html

I don't think there's anything suspicious about what he said.

I would have to agree..

The MJ on different personalities

Oprah & Geraldo - Real MJ

Diane Sawyer & Ed Bradley - Victim MJ

Barbara Walters & Martin Bashir - Childlike MJ

jade jackson wrote:Do you remember the 60 minutes interview in 2003,with Ed Bradley. Remember when Michael says "That's not Michael Jackson, I'm sorry. That was someone else" See the transcript of the interview, almost at the end. Do you think this bolsters your theory. I always thought that was an odd remark, and wondered what he meant.

http://www.allmichaeljackson.com/interviews/cbs60mins.html

To simplify what he said : Its not Him. Or He cant do that.

Yes, it does reinforce the theory. At the time of the interview, the statement went right past me. I didn't hear it in a way to make me question it. As I re-visited MJ interviews post-June 25th and heard it, I paused and listened multiple times.

Sometimes people joke about having an "evil twin" when they are having moods swings. I just shook my head and wondered if MJ was making light of the serious accusation and alluding to an "evil twin". After reviewing it, I saw that he wasn't be light-hearted and was clearly letting Mr. Bradley know that it wasn't him.

Thanks for reading my theory and sharing your feedback.

BTW - I have been reading up on MK Ultra and Illuminati since posting the theory. Oh boy oh boy...that information really bolsters the theory.

jade jackson wrote:Do you remember the 60 minutes interview in 2003,with Ed Bradley. Remember when Michael says "That's not Michael Jackson, I'm sorry. That was someone else" See the transcript of the interview, almost at the end. Do you think this bolsters your theory. I always thought that was an odd remark, and wondered what he meant.

http://www.allmichaeljackson.com/interviews/cbs60mins.html

Thanks for reading my theory.

At the time of the original interview, I didn't think there was anything suspicious either. I saw the interview much differently after June 25th.

phyli wrote:I don't think there's anything suspicious about what he said.

Thanks for reading the theory and sharing feedback. Good breakdown of "who" may have been present at different times.

Initially I thought that The King of Pop was the only one present during the Bashir interview. You bring up Little Mikey. The odd and impulsive shopping spree now makes me think that a child may have been present to do that part. He sees something and wants it without thinking of cost or practical purpose of what he's buying. Perhaps both MJ's were present at different times of that interview (8 months was covered).

queenpanther55 wrote:I would have to agree..

The MJ on different personalities

Oprah & Geraldo - Real MJ

Diane Sawyer & Ed Bradley - Victim MJ

Barbara Walters & Martin Bashir - Childlike MJ

Are the first 4 parts of your theory still on hear or have they been deleted by now. Just curious, wanted to go back and take a look at the others.

sorry I meant on "here" not "hear"

I believe that all five parts of the theory are still posted. They may have been pushed back to older pages.

Yes, please read all five parts otherwise the theory may appear odd without the background of why I came up with the theory. I fully understood that the theory would be disturbing and controversial to some people. It was and still is disturbing even to me. Mental health topics make many people feel uncomfortable because they often wonder if such behavior can happen to them or someone that they know.