Everything screams HOAX!

Hello my fellow friends...

I know that TMZ is not a reliable place but...we were all waiting for some signs....and, to me...if the children are being homeschooled and also this:

http://www.tmz.com/2009/09/09/michael-jackson-wrongful-death-family-conrad-murray-lawyers/

To me screams HOAX!!!!

And that our angel is ALIVE!!

I want your opinions, please. Not attacking opinions...but only opinions...not everyone may be in agreement with my ideas...and I will respect that, as you (my forum friends) know, I am very respectful and calm. (Until somebody push my buttons)

Thank you very, very much!!

I love you, my friends!!

EmanViam



Jacksons -- Problems With Wrongful Death Suit



Posted Sep 9th 2009 1:40AM by TMZ Staff

Various members of Michael Jackson's family tell TMZ they are already talking about lawyers who might rep them in a wrongful death lawsuit against Dr. Conrad Murray and others ... but Jackson's death may prove to be such an economic bonanza that it could torpedo a lawsuit.

In California, Jackson's immediate family could sue for the economic loss they have suffered by Jackson's death -- e.g., the financial support Jackson could have provided had he lived. Here's the problem -- Jackson's death may actually be an economic gain.

It's already becoming clear Michael Jackson is more profitable in death than he was in the last years of his life. Therefore, even if lawyers proved Dr. Murray and others were responsible for Jackson's death ... they could still come up with goose eggs.

The family could also recover for non-economic damages such as loss of companionship and love. The problem -- in California, if the lawsuit is based on malpractice against a medical provider, these damages would be limited to $250,000 total.

The final possibility -- if the family could prove the defendants acted with malice, they could get punitive damages. "Malice" includes proof of "despicable conduct." The family could also win punitive damages if the defendant is convicted of felony homicide. But in California, punitive damages have to bear some relationship to damages for economic or non-economic losses. Typically punitives are limited to nine times those damages.

It ain't as easy as it seems.

it screams HOAX since june29

Wrongful death means that had something NOT been done incorrectly that the person would still be ALIVE!!! It makes no sense that a wrongful death suit is related to the deceased income. This article screams BS and the Jackson's definitely scream HOAX!

MJalive wrote:it screams HOAX since june29

why 29 ?


for me it screemed hoax ever since the O2 announcement !!!

emanviam wrote:Hello my fellow friends...

I know that TMZ is not a reliable place but...we were all waiting for some signs....and, to me...if the children are being homeschooled and also this:

http://www.tmz.com/2009/09/09/michael-jackson-wrongful-death-family-conrad-murray-lawyers/

To me screams HOAX!!!!

And that our angel is ALIVE!!

I want your opinions, please. Not attacking opinions...but only opinions...not everyone may be in agreement with my ideas...and I will respect that, as you (my forum friends) know, I am very respectful and calm. (Until somebody push my buttons)

Thank you very, very much!!

I love you, my friends!!

EmanViam



Jacksons -- Problems With Wrongful Death Suit



Posted Sep 9th 2009 1:40AM by TMZ Staff

Various members of Michael Jackson's family tell TMZ they are already talking about lawyers who might rep them in a wrongful death lawsuit against Dr. Conrad Murray and others ... but Jackson's death may prove to be such an economic bonanza that it could torpedo a lawsuit.

In California, Jackson's immediate family could sue for the economic loss they have suffered by Jackson's death -- e.g., the financial support Jackson could have provided had he lived. Here's the problem -- Jackson's death may actually be an economic gain.

It's already becoming clear Michael Jackson is more profitable in death than he was in the last years of his life. Therefore, even if lawyers proved Dr. Murray and others were responsible for Jackson's death ... they could still come up with goose eggs.

The family could also recover for non-economic damages such as loss of companionship and love. The problem -- in California, if the lawsuit is based on malpractice against a medical provider, these damages would be limited to $250,000 total.

The final possibility -- if the family could prove the defendants acted with malice, they could get punitive damages. "Malice" includes proof of "despicable conduct." The family could also win punitive damages if the defendant is convicted of felony homicide. But in California, punitive damages have to bear some relationship to damages for economic or non-economic losses. Typically punitives are limited to nine times those damages.

It ain't as easy as it seems.

HOAX!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Brown

Why is it that James Brown's death and memorial seem eerily similar to Michael's?

JMO

I think it's an ups...

All these stories and statements from sources, insiders & family is just a way of keeping MJ in the news. The whole thing is one big fat hoax!

kdkennedy74 wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Brown

Why is it that James Brown's death and memorial seem eerily similar to Michael's?

JMO

Oh I think they did that on purpose-Brown being Michaels hero (though Michael soared much higher)

Actually when I first heard about Katherine going to this school where kids were supposed to go I was sad. I felt that they went against MJ´s wishes for his kids. So I thought to myself, IF this somehow changes into children being homeschooled then I´ll know he´s alive. And voila! I swear that was exactly what I said.

Why is it that James Brown's death and memorial seem eerily similar to Michael's

EXCEPT of course,james brown had an OPEN casket in which his fans and mourners were able to SEE him,they did leave that one obviously out.

MJalive wrote:it screams HOAX since june29

I since june 25th

Why does TMZ has almost daily news about Michael Jackson? I can't find another site with news about him that constantly!

Michael, are they working for you