Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2?

by Rach Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:04 pm

Hey Guys,

So you may remember a few days ago I posted a question wanting to know how tall Kenny Ortega was and now I am posting as to why! (Thanks to everyone who answered by the way!!)

I am now CONVINCED after looking at countless photos and analyzing lots of footage that is wasn't Michael at the O2. Please have a look at the pictures below and let me know what you think Smile

This is of "O2 Man" and Dermot O'Leary who introduced him in London. I have searched Dermot's height and he is between 5'8 - 5'9 and very embarrased about this I might add! Look at the height difference between them. If Michael was indeed 5'10, all I can say is he grew an awful lot by the time he went to London!

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Michaelanddermot

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Michaelanddermot

I at first thought "O2 Man" may be on a podium of some sort but have a look at this footage from the O2 and you will see that the ground appears to be level throughout the entire speech. I also thought that Dermot is slumping a bit but I don't think that would make too much of a difference to the height difference, maybe an inch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c00CwFA5JNE

Now, have a look at the pictures below of Michael with Kenny Ortega and President Bill Clinton.

I am still not sure on Kenny Ortega's height and as far as I am aware he never replied to the tweets LOL. From what I can gather Michael and Kenny appear to be the same height, but at 6'1 President Clinton is a lot taller than Michael. Infact, this picture seems to indicate Michael is A LOT smaller, and thanks to Michelle who posted on the height thread, she said that Michael's dressmaker once said he was only 5'8-5'9, which if true would make him as tall as Dermot. Having said that why is there such a height difference?

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Michaelandkenny

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Michaelandkenny

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Michaelandkenny2

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Michaelandbillclinton

Please let me know your thoughts on this Smile

Rach xoxo

by Give.In.To.Me Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:12 pm

welcome back Rachel.

Did you take in to account that O2 dude was wearing heeled boots? Just asking.

by Rach Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:17 pm

Give.In.To.Me wrote:welcome back Rachel.

Did you take in to account that O2 dude was wearing heeled boots? Just asking.

Thanks Chick Smile

No I didn't LOL. I am so ditzy! However, I will have a look over this and I am sure I can fit it into my theory! I am still convinced this dude is a big fat FAKE!!!

by hungry Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:20 pm

I think you're kind of getting somewhere. At first I thought that it was a double, then I dismissed that idea and now I'm considering it Very Happy

Keep it up!

by aamj07 Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:23 pm

I can't tell you how many times I've gone back & forth with O2 guy. I still don't know what to think about him. Great work on the height comparisons though! There are definitely some inconsistencies there.

by Sweet1 Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:25 pm

Rach,
You were Spot on! I knew from the jump 02 guy wasn't MJ when he was first televised. His demeanor, looks, hands, everything was so different from MJ. That horrible voice and that swaying walk like someone off the streets. Completely unlike MJ in every way, shape and form. I know we have been discussing this for sometime. I think those that believe it's MJ will believe it and those that don't will believe it's not. Great to have you back on board Sweetie! Keep the Faith!

by annieisnotokey Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:28 pm

I don't know.
In these 2 pics they seem to be almost the same height with MJ being just a little taller than Dermot O'Leary, which is explained by the heeled boots and the fact that DO'L is leaning into MJ to listen to his question.

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? 269

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? 269

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? 311

Maybe the one with Bill Clinton is the fake MJ? lol!

by Rach Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:29 pm

Sweet1 wrote:Rach,
You were Spot on! I knew from the jump 02 guy wasn't MJ when he was first televised. His demeanor, looks, hands, everything was so different from MJ. That horrible voice and that swaying walk like someone off the streets. Completely unlike MJ in every way, shape and form. I know we have been discussing this for sometime. I think those that believe it's MJ will believe it and those that don't will believe it's not. Great to have you back on board Sweetie! Keep the Faith!

Thanks Sweetie!

I think you are right about people believing what they want to and I am in no way trying to influence what people think. I have just started to re-examine all of the "evidence" and this has annoyed me for sometime and I wanted to have another look at it.

I will always believe it WAS NOT Michael at the O2 that day, even if he told me himself!!!

by phyli Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:31 pm

Here's a side note...I happened to watch an interview that Dermot had done after O2. He said that when he and MJ "bro" hugged, he said MJ was very muscular. It made me think that if Michael was heavily medicated and had been abusing drugs for quite awhile, wouldn't his muscletone dwindled? Just wondering...

by aamj07 Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:32 pm

I agree, Hungry! My initial reaction when I saw the O2 press conference (even before MJ died) was that there was no way it was MJ because of the way he walked, talked, looked, etc. Then after he "died" I realized many others were feeling the same way. But then I saw a thread (I can't remember if it was here or on MJHD) comparing the "real" MJ's hands to O2 guys hands and the purpose of the thread was to prove that they were different...However, I actually found some similarities in the hands that made me think that it actually WAS MJ at O2. I've seen several other threads dedicated to figuring out the O2 guy and there is tons of info supporting both theories...I've gone back & forth several times, I don't know what to think.

by Guest Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:34 pm

The pants Michael is wearing. He has them on at the rehearsel for his "This Is It"

And that IS Michael. Everytime.

by annieisnotokey Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:36 pm

by Rach Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:40 pm

I also came across these photos.

Look at the difference in the torso length. The second one apprears to be more lanky and look how far down his arms come compared to the first.

I know they are taken at different angles, so can someone advise if this would make a massive difference to the torso and arm proportions?

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Michaeljacksonjc

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Michaeljacksonjc

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? O2dude

by Sweet1 Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:45 pm

Rach wrote:
Sweet1 wrote:Rach,
You were Spot on! I knew from the jump 02 guy wasn't MJ when he was first televised. His demeanor, looks, hands, everything was so different from MJ. That horrible voice and that swaying walk like someone off the streets. Completely unlike MJ in every way, shape and form. I know we have been discussing this for sometime. I think those that believe it's MJ will believe it and those that don't will believe it's not. Great to have you back on board Sweetie! Keep the Faith!

Thanks Sweetie!

I think you are right about people believing what they want to and I am in no way trying to influence what people think. I have just started to re-examine all of the "evidence" and this has annoyed me for sometime and I wanted to have another look at it.

I will always believe it WAS NOT Michael at the O2 that day, even if he told me himself!!!

You're welcome honey,

Thank you for taking another look for everyone to re-examine.
You do great work always! Keep the Faith!

by mjssoulmate Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:53 pm

As far as I'm concerned that is Michael. Look at his right wrist! He may have been
unusual, but maybe that was due to excitement? After all it's been years since he toured. As far as the drug rumors, they are just that rumors. A lot of BS

by queenpanther55 Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:55 pm

Sometimes when we think too much, we arent finding the right answers to our doubts anymore. Most of MJ impersonators were seen performed and been interviewed. If you look at them closely , we could see differences from real MJ (that we cannot argue).

But if we think too much, we crashed very deeply. We take a look every inch of it, trying to find the right answers even if we knew the answers already.

You can tell whos the who actually.
People as we get older, tends to deteriorate physically.

You can do evaluation of yourself through many sources and not just one or two datas.

Photos can be deceiving.

by hungry Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:02 pm

I'm being tossed back and forth about this. I mean, it doesn't sound much like the Michael I'm used to hearing, but then again he looks the same (to me, anyway). I sometimes think we're over-analyzing things - like Michael said in the LWMJ documentary, the worst things a dancer can do is think. Is it possible that we're overthinking this too much?
Like Annie, "the more I think the more confused I get". Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Lol

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Lol

His voice is the things that throws me off. In videos I see from hollywoodtv with Michael directly in them, he sounds like he's always sounded. But at the press conference and in the This Is It trailer he sounded.. different. Maybe his voice matured? I don't know.

by Rach Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:04 pm

Guys, I'm not asking you to change your beliefs!

If you think it was Michael then that's fine and I won't try to convince you of otherwise. I just wanted to post what I had found and to me it indicates that it wasn't Michael at the O2 that day.

To me, the mannerisms are all off and not what we have seen from Michael in the past. I think we can toss this one about until the end of time but we will all NEVER agree Smile

by Give.In.To.Me Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:11 pm

Rach wrote:Guys, I'm not asking you to change your beliefs!

If you think it was Michael then that's fine and I won't try to convince you of otherwise. I just wanted to post what I had found and to me it indicates that it wasn't Michael at the O2 that day.

To me, the mannerisms are all off and not what we have seen from Michael in the past. I think we can toss this one about until the end of time but we will all NEVER agree

Hmmm, all I can say is I AGREE!!! I have such disbelief this is the real MJ that i'd argue with him myself that it wasn't him. Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Icon_biggrin

by Rach Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:13 pm

Give.In.To.Me wrote:Hmmm, all I can say is I AGREE!!! I have such disbelief this is the real MJ that i'd argue with him myself that it wasn't him.

OMG I said the same thing to someone else above!

When he comes back we can do it together. Two against one!!!!

by mjj29081958 Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:21 pm

I'm trying sooooo hard to keep my mind open about this, in all threads about real / fake / double Michael's, but I guess I'm one of the minority who believes that is the real Michael in all pics, rehersals ... I really would like to see what you can see on it! But I can only see Michael's everywhere!! (This is starting to worry me!! lol!)
Anyway, as I said before, I'm going to keep my mind and my eyes open on it, so any new evidence is welcome!!!! Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Icon_biggrin

And let me say that you all people are doing an incredible job here!!!

by GirlSaturday Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:17 am

Good grief...These pictures are now causing my head to spin in circles.

I have been focusing on one area...his hands especially his fingers i.e size and length. They appear to be the same in each picture shown.

I do not know what to think anymore regarding the mysterious O2 guy.
Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Icon_sad

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Suspect

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Kopfschuettel

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Confused

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Affraid

Was he MJ or not?

by Daphne-Lechinski Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:28 am

MJ FAKE! '-'
The digital hand of Mike are different than those of the "double" The smile is not the same old, Michael is not as busy as it was there, was acting very different, Michael's sweet to talk. And the voice was not so serious. ._.'

by GirlSaturday Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:30 am

Welcome ...Daphne-Lechinski!

I am crazy but I thought that I had really definitely gone off of the deep end. I am so glad that someone else noticed the hands as well.

Daphne-Lechinski wrote:MJ FAKE! '-'
The digital hand of Mike are different than those of the "double" The smile is not the same old, Michael is not as busy as it was there, was acting very different, Michael's sweet to talk. And the voice was not so serious. ._.'

by MJfan777 Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:44 am

michael at the 02 is the same of TII trailer = FACT.

now, if its the same MJ... i dont know.

(sure, there are TWO michael on TII trailer)

by MJfan777 Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:46 am

Rach wrote:Guys, I'm not asking you to change your beliefs!

If you think it was Michael then that's fine and I won't try to convince you of otherwise. I just wanted to post what I had found and to me it indicates that it wasn't Michael at the O2 that day.

To me, the mannerisms are all off and not what we have seen from Michael in the past. I think we can toss this one about until the end of time but we will all NEVER agree

i thought the same, rach.
but after i read AEG contract ... i'm thinking now that MJ would be ACTING like a loser

by J.J_loves_MJ Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:05 am

Rach wrote:Hey Guys,

So you may remember a few days ago I posted a question wanting to know how tall Kenny Ortega was and now I am posting as to why! (Thanks to everyone who answered by the way!!)

I am now CONVINCED after looking at countless photos and analyzing lots of footage that is wasn't Michael at the O2. Please have a look at the pictures below and let me know what you think

This is of "O2 Man" and Dermot O'Leary who introduced him in London. I have searched Dermot's height and he is between 5'8 - 5'9 and very embarrased about this I might add! Look at the height difference between them. If Michael was indeed 5'10, all I can say is he grew an awful lot by the time he went to London!

I at first thought "O2 Man" may be on a podium of some sort but have a look at this footage from the O2 and you will see that the ground appears to be level throughout the entire speech. I also thought that Dermot is slumping a bit but I don't think that would make too much of a difference to the height difference, maybe an inch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c00CwFA5JNE

Now, have a look at the pictures below of Michael with Kenny Ortega and President Bill Clinton.

I am still not sure on Kenny Ortega's height and as far as I am aware he never replied to the tweets LOL. From what I can gather Michael and Kenny appear to be the same height, but at 6'1 President Clinton is a lot taller than Michael. Infact, this picture seems to indicate Michael is A LOT smaller, and thanks to Michelle who posted on the height thread, she said that Michael's dressmaker once said he was only 5'8-5'9, which if true would make him as tall as Dermot. Having said that why is there such a height difference?

Please let me know your thoughts on this

Rach xoxo

I am sorry Rach, but I am 100% convinced that O2 guy is MICHAEL.

by DreamsComeTrue Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:11 am

J.J_loves_MJ wrote:
Rach wrote:Hey Guys,

So you may remember a few days ago I posted a question wanting to know how tall Kenny Ortega was and now I am posting as to why! (Thanks to everyone who answered by the way!!)

I am now CONVINCED after looking at countless photos and analyzing lots of footage that is wasn't Michael at the O2. Please have a look at the pictures below and let me know what you think

This is of "O2 Man" and Dermot O'Leary who introduced him in London. I have searched Dermot's height and he is between 5'8 - 5'9 and very embarrased about this I might add! Look at the height difference between them. If Michael was indeed 5'10, all I can say is he grew an awful lot by the time he went to London!

I at first thought "O2 Man" may be on a podium of some sort but have a look at this footage from the O2 and you will see that the ground appears to be level throughout the entire speech. I also thought that Dermot is slumping a bit but I don't think that would make too much of a difference to the height difference, maybe an inch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c00CwFA5JNE

Now, have a look at the pictures below of Michael with Kenny Ortega and President Bill Clinton.

I am still not sure on Kenny Ortega's height and as far as I am aware he never replied to the tweets LOL. From what I can gather Michael and Kenny appear to be the same height, but at 6'1 President Clinton is a lot taller than Michael. Infact, this picture seems to indicate Michael is A LOT smaller, and thanks to Michelle who posted on the height thread, she said that Michael's dressmaker once said he was only 5'8-5'9, which if true would make him as tall as Dermot. Having said that why is there such a height difference?

Please let me know your thoughts on this

Rach xoxo

I am sorry Rach, but I am 100% convinced that O2 guy is MICHAEL.

Me too! I actually just finished looking at the O2 guy photos . I'm sure he's Michael and I'll try to demonstrate that! I just need more photos to compare with! I've seen almost 400 pic with O2 guy, witch is Michael! I hope I won't go crazy after finishing this! Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Icon_pale

by MJSmile4Us Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:17 am

I am 50/50 on this. if I look at the relatively larger dimple on the O2 guy's chin compared to that of real Michael that we know and love, I am inclined to believe that O2 guy was just another impersonator or a double. and his mannerism and his jaws were out of ordinary (it was not the way our Michael would have gone about to express his excitemen about the tour imo..) and bigger.. Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Icon_scratch

by amber Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:15 pm

there is a pic of mj behind curtain at o2 thats him he has a little stuble, however the o2 guy who was speaking was clean shavin & is not mj thats my opinion.

by Rach Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:20 pm

J.J_loves_MJ wrote:I am sorry Rach, but I am 100% convinced that O2 guy is MICHAEL.

JJ you don't have to keep apologising to me if you don't believe my findings! We are all here for the same thing but I can say with 100% conviction we will NEVER all agree Smile

I respect that you don't agree with me and if believe it's Michael that's fine. As I have said numerous times the aim of my findings isn't to convince people. I just want to share what I have found.

by ilprincipe Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:22 pm

There'll always be disagreements with this o2 guy topic...
as you see on my choice of words "o2 guy"
that I also don't think this was the real MJ.
There is this pic...MJ behind the curtain -there at o2 arena-
this person was really MJ...
but the person who announced the "this is it" concerts
wasn't MJ IMHO

by nlb Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:26 pm

Rach wrote:
Give.In.To.Me wrote:Hmmm, all I can say is I AGREE!!! I have such disbelief this is the real MJ that i'd argue with him myself that it wasn't him.

OMG I said the same thing to someone else above!

When he comes back we can do it together. Two against one!!!!

Count me in too, cause I don't think I'd believe him if he told me it was him either!

by mattie Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:34 pm

Hello.
I also from day 0ne thougt the 02 guy was not Michael.
The guy behind the curtains is him..dont know why..cant put my finger on it..just see it! Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Icon_rolleyes

by Guest Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:40 pm

mattie wrote:Hello.
I also from day 0ne thougt the 02 guy was not Michael.
The guy behind the curtains is him..dont know why..cant put my finger on it..just see it!

I agree.

BTW Welcome to the biggest MJ family in the world Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Icon_smile

by nlb Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:48 pm

ilprincipe wrote:There'll always be disagreements with this o2 guy topic...
as you see on my choice of words "o2 guy"
that I also don't think this was the real MJ.
There is this pic...MJ behind the curtain -there at o2 arena-
this person was really MJ...
but the person who announced the "this is it" concerts
wasn't MJ IMHO

Totally agree with everything you said Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Icon_smile

by Sweet1 Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:53 pm

ilprincipe wrote:There'll always be disagreements with this o2 guy topic...
as you see on my choice of words "o2 guy"
that I also don't think this was the real MJ.
There is this pic...MJ behind the curtain -there at o2 arena-
this person was really MJ...
but the person who announced the "this is it" concerts
wasn't MJ IMHO

Thank you! I agree with you 100%!
MJ was behind the curtain surveying the audience to see how they were responding to the 02 guy giving the announcement about the upcoming concert This Is It! There was never a question that MJ wasn't there. He just didn't make the announcement. Keep the Faith!

by mommy Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:58 pm

Look at his teeth. Notice the "gap" between the lower front teeth. I don't know if it means anything. I'm not a dentist...
Gap (Bad aera)
http://mjjgallery.free.fr/bad/appearances/pepsi/045.jpg

Gap (2006)
http://mjjgallery.free.fr/20062008/awards/wma/redcarpet/012.jpg

No gap (O2 conference)
http://mjjgallery.free.fr/2009/appearances/o2press/043.jpg

Or maybe it's the angle the pics taken from....

by Rach Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:58 pm

Now to ME these don't look like the same person at all but I have explained my reasons so won't do so again.

Again I am NOT trying to sway opinions, but point out therr are differences in the facial features and if you believe this is Michael I respect that 100%. I just ask that you respect I don't.

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? 2009xj

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? 2009xj

Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? 85601042

by mattie Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:58 pm

Hello Everybody.
I was here before..just dont post much(I am from the Netherlands) because i have problems with correct writing in Englisch.
But i am on top of everything..and follow it all here!
Not many believers here were i live..so they think i lost it!
Greetings to all

by mjssoulmate Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:17 pm

Hi mattie,
Welcome!

by EarthAngel90 Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:43 pm

2009 pic is showing me something but I can't explain ... I think it could be a Impersonator .... but IDK anymore ....

by emanviam Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:09 pm

Rach wrote:I also came across these photos.

Look at the difference in the torso length. The second one apprears to be more lanky and look how far down his arms come compared to the first.

I know they are taken at different angles, so can someone advise if this would make a massive difference to the torso and arm proportions?

I don't know...all what I can see is that the O2 Michael has one of the buttons OPEN!! I am so craving Nutella now! LOL

by dunno_it Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:34 pm

Rach, I aagree with you, high heels would not make so much difference. to me it's not MJ at o2- and hands and wrists? well, they look similar to MJ's but well, with today's make-up techniques well, they could have been made to look MJ's. If you can do anything with your face now, you can do it with wrists and nails, I guess. Or these might have be digitalized...

by AlexaMicke Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:42 am

hello everyone, this my first post/opinion here..
i must say that i really think that the truth is hidden in the History Era..i really think that..and i'm still investigating that Era..for answers..
about the guy from o2..of course is not Michael..even from before..in 2006 at the WMA..it was the same guy that was at o2..
differences are a lot...how he walks, smile, voice, behaviour..
and the picture when he embrasses the one that introduced him..you saw that 'Michael' says something to the guy... the guy revealed after the conference that 'michael' asked him if the promter is on...
WHY would michael need a promter???
in every conference i saw of the real Michael..he has a paper with him...so
my final opinion is that we didn't saw the real Michael Jackson from 2005 after the trial..

just my opinion
Is this ACTUAL proof that it was NOT Michael at the O2? Icon_rr

by Sweet1 Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:56 am

Welcome to the family AlexaMicke,
Sweetie I believe there is a thread today about the double. Go ahead and check that out. Again! Welcome and I look forward to reading more of your opinions and theories. Keep the Faith!

by Kuki Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:25 am

mattie wrote:Hello Everybody.
I was here before..just dont post much(I am from the Netherlands) because i have problems with correct writing in Englisch.
But i am on top of everything..and follow it all here!
Not many believers here were i live..so they think i lost it!
Greetings to all

Hey Mattie, welcome and enjoy! As you can see, I'm from the Netherlands as well and I am a believer myself too, so you're not alone in our country! There are more Dutch girls here who also believe that MJ is still alive!

Keep the faith, the truth will come out!! And your english is fine!

by THE JACKSONOLOGIST Fri Sep 18, 2009 12:03 pm

emanviam wrote:
Rach wrote:I also came across these photos.

Look at the difference in the torso length. The second one apprears to be more lanky and look how far down his arms come compared to the first.

I know they are taken at different angles, so can someone advise if this would make a massive difference to the torso and arm proportions?

I don't know...all what I can see is that the O2 Michael has one of the buttons OPEN!! I am so craving Nutella now! LOL

Nutella!! LOLOLOL!!!!

Why has no one looked at O2's FINGERNAILS!!!!
ALso on the contrary....O2's wrist has tha bone sticking out like MJ's does....man, I dont know!!

by EarthAngel90 Fri Sep 18, 2009 1:33 pm

London 02 "Michael" is too long in the arms - a bit too thin .... actually way too thin .... has to be a imposter ...

by Liberian_Girl Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:14 am

Maybe he just looks different?

Maybe it’s because he lost a lot of weight (he looks very skinny) of maybe he did another plastic surgery? It can be. In Bashier’s documentary Michael sad he had only two surgery’s but it was in 2003.

Not one of Michaels imposters ( Navi, E’Casanova …) looks exactly like him.

Sorry for my English.

by Sponsored content