IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

by Harleyblonde Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:58 pm

Was browsing on the internet and looking for similar recent deaths concerning administered drugs and came across this. Anna Nicole Smith died in Feb 07 and those responsible were not charged until March 09. I still believe the hoax death theory but we have to think that to make it realistic they may have to charge Doc Murray.The Jacksons-probably even MJ himself will be well aware that many think is all a hoax. Dont really know what to think but as many of us think if Doc Murray is not charged in the next few months he wont ever be -I thought that but seems we may have been wrong. Here is what I found: Would appreciate your feedback on this.

Fast Facts

Anna Nicole Smith was born on November 28, 1967, in Houston, Texas
She died on February 8, 2007, in Hollywood, Florida, at the age of 39
Autopsy report revealed that Smith died as a result of combined drug intoxication
Smith gave birth to daughter Dannielynn on September 7, 2006
Son Daniel Smith, 20, died from a drug overdose on September 10, 2006
Smith reportedly obtained an illegal Methadone prescription while 8 months pregnant
March 12, 2008: Howard K. Stern, Sandeep Kapoor and Khristine Eroshevich were arrested for conspiracy after allegedly providing Smith with prescription drugs including opiates and benzodiazepinsTelegraph: Smith's boyfriend charged with giving her drugs (March 13, 2009)
The three could face attempted murder chargesTelegraph: Smith's boyfriend charged with giving her drugs (March 13, 2009)

by Rach Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:07 pm

I think if Murry does get charged then he has been paid handsomly to be the fall guy, so to speak.

If we look at Annie's theory (again girl you rock!) she states that Murray could have been in financial difficulties and needed the money badly. People will do some crazy things for cash, believe me!

However, I still think thanks to the monumental screw ups of the LAPD no arrest can ever be made. They allowed people to go into the LA mansion before they had collected their evidence. I have no experience with the law but to me that just screams bad police work.

by annieisnotokey Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:16 pm

Rach wrote:I think if Murry does get charged then he has been paid handsomly to be the fall guy, so to speak.

If we look at Annie's theory (again girl you rock!) she states that Murray could have been in financial difficulties and needed the money badly. People will do some crazy things for cash, believe me!

However, I still think thanks to the monumental screw ups of the LAPD no arrest can ever be made. They allowed people to go into the LA mansion before they had collected their evidence. I have no experience with the law but to me that just screams bad police work.

Couldn't have said it better myself. All I can add is that there's a huge distance between charges being made and convictions taking place. Medical cases are incredibly hard to prosecute. If this hoax was planned with Dr. Murray taking the blame for it, the difficulty in getting a conviction has already been factored in.

Thank you Rach for always being so kind about my theory!! Very Happy

by ishealive Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:20 pm

@Rachel I agree 100% this is so outlandish, the whole case is not right, it seems extremely unprofessional.
I must look back at Heath Ledger & Anna Nicole's case 'cos I don't remember this going on.

by Sweet1 Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:34 pm

No one can remember any of this going on in any other cases because this is clearly out of the norm. This isn't real. It's a certifiable HOAX. If this was going to pass for authencity like Rach said it should have happened from day one. LAPD did a lousy job intentionally because it was never real. There's no credible evidence any longer. Everyone knows that the first 24-48 hrs are the most crucial in any case in gathering evidence. That window has long been closed. Anything they come up with now will be contrieved. If Dr. Murray does go to prison. He will appeal and let out long before his sentence ends. It's all in the script so to speak! Keep the Faith! IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years. Icon_smile

by nlb Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:38 pm

I know that in the Anna Nicole case her coronor would not give out any info until he had everything back. I remember him being on Nancy Grace, but he would not budge about talking before he had all the facts. It took six weeks for the results and there was a press conference about it.

I found this while looking at some info on Anna Nicole:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17788386//

The report found that a private nurse had asked a bodyguard to call 911
about 1 p.m. and had started CPR. The Seminole EMS was called about
1:40 p.m. by a bodyguard and arrived six minutes later. The ambulance
reached the hospital at 2:43 p.m., and Smith was pronounced dead
shortly thereafter.

by Guest Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:43 pm

Well why dont they just say that he will be charged in about 20-30 years? That will make the tabloids rich, while printing all their garbage about Mike Sad

by mjssoulmate Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:56 pm

On ET tonight they said that there is a secret grand jury and that Murray could be indicted within a week.

by Guest Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:01 pm

mjssoulmate wrote:On ET tonight they said that there is a secret grand jury and that Murray could be indicted within a week.

Indicted for what??? They have no proof.. This is getting more and more pathetic every day..

by Harleyblonde Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:13 pm

Also on a website I looked at it showed pictures of Anna Nicole Smith when she was found dead. I dont know how authentic they were-they looked genuine-they disturbed and upset me. Dont know how these leaked out but shows some people have no respect. Definetely no hoax there.

by hungry Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:16 pm

We won't stop 'til we get enough.
And I'm not even close to having enough. Not by a long shot.
That's all I can say.

by Guest Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:18 pm

Harleyblonde wrote:Also on a website I looked at it showed pictures of Anna Nicole Smith when she was found dead. I dont know how authentic they were-they looked genuine-they disturbed and upset me. Dont know how these leaked out but shows some people have no respect. Definetely no hoax there.

What website is that??

by annieisnotokey Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:31 pm

mjssoulmate wrote:On ET tonight they said that there is a secret grand jury and that Murray could be indicted within a week.

Secret!?

I don't think grand jury procedures can take place in secret. They can be done confidentially, but not in secret...

Is anybody from the US to back me up on this (or tell me to stop talking nonsense)?

by mjssoulmate Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:40 pm

I'm just repeating what ET said.

Sounds weird to me too.!

by annieisnotokey Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:08 pm

mjssoulmate wrote:I'm just repeating what ET said.

Sounds weird to me too.!

Of course you are.
My comment wasn't aimed at you, but at what ET said. Sorry for not clarifying that in my other post.

by nlb Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:31 pm

EXCLUSIVE: D.A. Likely To Send Case Against Dr. Murray To Grand Jury

Law enforcement sources close to the ongoing investigation into Michael Jackson's death tell RadarOnline.com that the Los Angeles District Attorney's office are "extremely likely to have a grand jury inpaneled to seek an indictment against Dr. Conrad Murray.

“This option is being heavily weighed by the office for several reasons. The grand jury meets in secret, and no one associated with the proceedings, including witnesses can discuss anything outside of the grand jury room. “More importantly, if Dr. Conrad Murray is indicted, there will be no preliminary hearing, and this is often done in high profile cases in Los Angeles. If an indictment is handed down, it goes straight to arraignment, and then to trial. The potential jury pool couldn't be tainted by saturated media coverage of a preliminary hearing."

If the district attorney does seek a grand jury for Dr. Murray, his lawyer, Ed Chernoff would receive a letter notifying him that a grand jury has been convened and invite Dr. Murray to testify, which he would most likely be advised not to attend.
Grand juries could indict Dr. Murray on charges from second degree murder to involuntary manslaughter, or reject charges all together,
although in Los Angeles, "grand juries are known to indict ham
sandwiches" the law enforcement source says.

I saw this on Radaronline, this is the only thing that I have seen about a Grand Jury though.

by annieisnotokey Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:44 pm

Exclusive images of Grand Jury secret meeting while deciding on Dr. Murray's indicment:

IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years. Stonecutters

by ~~Kristy~~ Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:47 pm

annieisnotokey wrote:Exclusive images of Grand Jury secret meeting while deciding on Dr. Murray's indicment:

IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years. Lol

nice Annie

by Guest Thu Sep 17, 2009 9:01 pm

nlb wrote:EXCLUSIVE: D.A. Likely To Send Case Against Dr. Murray To Grand Jury

Law enforcement sources close to the ongoing investigation into Michael Jackson's death tell RadarOnline.com that the Los Angeles District Attorney's office are "extremely likely to have a grand jury inpaneled to seek an indictment against Dr. Conrad Murray.

“This option is being heavily weighed by the office for several reasons. The grand jury meets in secret, and no one associated with the proceedings, including witnesses can discuss anything outside of the grand jury room. “More importantly, if Dr. Conrad Murray is indicted, there will be no preliminary hearing, and this is often done in high profile cases in Los Angeles. If an indictment is handed down, it goes straight to arraignment, and then to trial. The potential jury pool couldn't be tainted by saturated media coverage of a preliminary hearing."

If the district attorney does seek a grand jury for Dr. Murray, his lawyer, Ed Chernoff would receive a letter notifying him that a grand jury has been convened and invite Dr. Murray to testify, which he would most likely be advised not to attend.
Grand juries could indict Dr. Murray on charges from second degree murder to involuntary manslaughter, or reject charges all together,
although in Los Angeles, "grand juries are known to indict ham
sandwiches" the law enforcement source says.

I saw this on Radaronline, this is the only thing that I have seen about a Grand Jury though.

¨

This is the dumbest thing Ive ever heard in my life.
WTF almost 3 months later.?? Oh You dont really have too hurry do you?? Like they have nothing else to do.

This is the most embarresing, and pathetic so called police investergation Ive ever been a witness to, for my entire life.
How will they prove anything when they have nothing they can prove it with?? If Murray did this (Wich I serioulsy doubt) He have had all the time in the world to destroy every possible evedience.

Where the hell did they draw their aducation?? In a freaking wending machine?

Jeeezzzz

by nlb Thu Sep 17, 2009 9:02 pm

annieisnotokey wrote:Exclusive images of Grand Jury secret meeting while deciding on Dr. Murray's indicment:

by nlb Thu Sep 17, 2009 9:16 pm

IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years. 270915355_c8b9ae48e6

Where the hell did they draw their education??

by Sweet1 Thu Sep 17, 2009 9:22 pm

nlb wrote:
annieisnotokey wrote:Exclusive images of Grand Jury secret meeting while deciding on Dr. Murray's indicment:

by Truth_or_Dare Fri Sep 18, 2009 6:09 am

I don't remember where I read this, but this lawyer said it's not likely Murray will be convicted, even if he goes to trial, because the investigation started 3 days after Michael "died" and by that time the "crime scene" could have been changed because of all the people that went in an out and took things out. He said Murray's lawyer can easly proof that there is reason to believe he might have been framed...He says he has a lot of chances to be acquitted. And I think he's right...I think it was meant like this in the first place. The focus is put on Murray, nothing happens to him cause he won;t be charged, he got his money, and Michael can take care of his problems without anybody having time to focus on him.
I also think that's why there are only 3 officer investigating this case...to stall...and get nowhere..

by Sponsored content

IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.

Re: IF Doc Murray is charged-could take 2 years.