pics of marech 6 and march 7

Sorry if posted before
IS IT HIS BROTHER? CONTINUATION OF THE CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS




........



Nose looks like silicone false nose (green mark) and due to this we see such a heavy make up (white mark).
Lips: I can see that this man's lips shape was changed by a surgery (blue mark). I really do not think Michael needed that!
Skin: Michael's skin is so thin that you can see the grid of blood vessels through. Different skin with impostor: very thick young skin. Or silicone mask like in 'Ghosts'?




........



At the press conference we see a man showing us all Michael's typical gestures like he trained them at the mirror preparing for the event.
the imposter has a narrower face,
in the pics we can see hair have difficult long and form. Please take a look at these pictures: on the one dated March 5 you can see short hair, but on the one dated March 6 he has much longer hair!
Michael wears glasses a little awry due to his nose, but the impostor's glasses fit him perfectly.
Michael's mouth is smaller
Michael's upper lip is not so curved
When smiling Michael's mouth angles go down like he's sad, but we have different thing with impostor: his mouth angles go up.
right side of Michael's face is lower than left side.

To me the pictures look different as well.
(what do you mean with "is this his brother?" is this ironically?)

But yes, to me they are different.

This look abit different too.

GirlInTheMirror1 wrote:To me the pictures look different as well.
(what do you mean with "is this his brother?" is this ironically?)

But yes, to me they are different.

Ditto, what do you mean by is this his brother?

well nothing im not saying he is his brother it just he is looking same like him so just said is he his brother

amy wrote:well nothing im not saying he is his brother it just he is looking same like him so just said is he his brother

I see, btw.. thankyou for posting it.

just again another comparison between o2guy and MJ
and yes...I still refuse to believe that MJ announced the tour....

this pics are just another proof for me to deny it furthermore

@ilprincipe
did you enlarge the pics of the O2? You'll notice they were all photoshopped in a very hasty unprofessional way to make Michael look younger and take away most scars, wrinkles, beard shadows and and and.

This makes it so hard to believe it was the same person as on the other pics of that day or days before and after.

The pics of O2 are falsified.

There's a little detail that proves it was Mike. His neck...seriously...
I mean, some of those pics were taken outside, some inside. Different lighting, different expression, different make-up, different wig, that's all. But of course, everyone has an opinion.

I really don't like to see photos where everyone's picking apart Michael's face. I think if he were reading these threads he'd hate it and feel hurt. Maybe he used a double, I don't know...but I believe it was him at O2, and if it was, then it's pretty insulting to say it looks like he has a silicone false nose, etc. Maybe I'm just sensitive, but it's how I feel.

wandulka wrote:There's a little detail that proves it was Mike. His neck...seriously...
I mean, some of those pics were taken outside, some inside. Different lighting, different expression, different make-up, different wig, that's all. But of course, everyone has an opinion.

What about his neck?

wandulka wrote:There's a little detail that proves it was Mike. His neck...seriously...
I mean, some of those pics were taken outside, some inside. Different lighting, different expression, different make-up, different wig, that's all. But of course, everyone has an opinion.

I agree with you wandulka!
Please paste ur thread again...they need to see the truth...gosh!
BTW, I love that photo of MJ...Gosh...look at his teeth...they are the same, the scars, hands, nose, chin, cheeks, lips!

No offence to anyone, Surgery can do miracles...but not this way...sorry...
Just my opinion!

yes...like brothers...just few things in common...i saw these pics before and i always believed that there are two different persons...and i am sure of it !

DreamsComeTrue wrote:

wandulka wrote:There's a little detail that proves it was Mike. His neck...seriously...
I mean, some of those pics were taken outside, some inside. Different lighting, different expression, different make-up, different wig, that's all. But of course, everyone has an opinion.

I agree with you wandulka!
Please paste ur thread again...they need to see the truth...gosh!
BTW, I love that photo of MJ...Gosh...look at his teeth...they are the same, the scars, hands, nose, chin, cheeks, lips!

No offence to anyone, Surgery can do miracles...but not this way...sorry...
Just my opinion!

You're right....thank you..and by the way, what thread do you mean?

Anyway, I posted another proof to the "It was Michael at the O2 conference" thread...check it out guys and let me know what you think..

We're never going to agree that it was or wasn't MJ at the o2 so we might aswell just let it go.

ishealive wrote:We're never going to agree that it was or wasn't MJ at the o2 so we might aswell just let it go.

Exactly guys! At this point, everyone has made his own mind about it (at least I do!), and it´s ok, whether you think it's Mike or not!

I've seen a lot of Michaels photos, many many times. Like usual celebrities, before they go out to public, eg televisions, movies, promotions, conference, they all make visits to dermatologist for botox, enhancement, etc etc..

It has been known that Michael always wear make up anywhere and WHAT MORE ON THIS PRESS CONFERENCE?

I dont see any difference at all. Michael looks different in every public appearances he did. Its just that were too focus on this which in my own opinion, i think that is really him..

mjj29081958 wrote:

ishealive wrote:We're never going to agree that it was or wasn't MJ at the o2 so we might aswell just let it go.

Exactly guys! At this point, everyone has made his own mind about it (at least I do!), and it´s ok, whether you think it's Mike or not!

yes you r rite

Oh dear! I dont know if you guys are the same opinion as me but I keep changing my mind if it is the real MJ at the 02 or not. Everyone is pointing out very valid points for and against and I still cannot decide for sure. Am I the only one who is undecided as some of you seem so sure?

Harleyblonde wrote:Oh dear! I dont know if you guys are the same opinion as me but I keep changing my mind if it is the real MJ at the 02 or not. Everyone is pointing out very valid points for and against and I still cannot decide for sure. Am I the only one who is undecided as some of you seem so sure?

Nope. Me too. I just can´t decide! Or I do and then something comes along and changes my mind again.