Read if you dare !!!!!!!!

i dont believe the twin but michael called a lot of people brother did he sing with anyone special in the movie

Two things come to mind as I looked at the booklet:
-the statement is clearly positioned to be seen
-no name is given to identify who makes statement

It wasn't hidden in some liner notes on the cd. It was positioned to be noticed. People are paid well to proofread before something as important as this is released. We have noticed their intentional error. The lack of a name of who is making the statement causes a lot of guessing.

Mission accomplished.

ok,had this been from the other brothers backing on this is it,wouldnt it have read,ALWAYS GREAT TO SING WITH OUR brother? instead of my?this is whats nuts,could it have been like a cousin/brother thing?does ANYONE have explanation for this on the cd?

even putting all the "alleged,suspicious" not looking like etc. mannerisms etc. aside,
just going by this one sentence on the cd,what or WHO could it have been?AND if not a big secret deal,why the mystery?has sony or ANYONE else or can anyone else answer any questions about this ? this just stands way out to me, i am NOT saying oh,yes,def. most def. he has a twin, i am just saying as far out as this WHOLE situation has gotten and it feels really crazy at times, this poss?the only thing i can relate to and keep going back to,is we all know how talented amazingly talented this man was,so,could it have been TWO talented people?one more shy the other more entertainer and could he have felt and been alone BECAUSE he/they COULDNT be seen,out together,or hanging out together etc.?
I know,its crazy,maybe could be a REALLY good double too,i dont know this is a stretch,a FAR reach but,i gotta consider and be open to anything

but how could anyone that famous hide a twin all these years people talk especially la toya and its true joe would have had him making money as well

i have that album and it says my brother it really does

Human_nature wrote:

I have to admit that this picture is somewhat driving me crazy. I at first thought it was fake and there were two men. The light shining in is directly shining in and not reflected by the mirrors. The trousers of one man are wrinkled, on the other they are straight. The hands and fingers are different. The expression on the faces is different and the eyes seem to be looking in different directions.

Then I found the larger picture that showed the mirror walls better. The mirrors are supposed to go round Michael like a U-turn. (You will identify the mirrors due to the fingertraces.)

BUT: would Michael perfectionist ever authorize a picture where you can clearly see dirty fingertraces on a mirror? Or is this set up to be a mirror illusion (he loved illusions) and in fact it was not a mirror?

I cannot decide. Do you have a clue whether that's one man or two? Any photograph among us with better eyes? LOL

the mirror looks like a waxwork to me

The "reflection" looks like a wax figure or a double..........a very GOOD double. The ears are different. The face of the "reflection" seems off...

does anyone know if there is a wax lookalike out there like this,i know they have done others,but,one like this?

i think i heard that mj used one for LEAVE ME ALONE maybe he had one made

I just had a weird thought. Beware: it isn't my first nor will be the last.

The statement below applies to child actors but it made me scratch my head, pause and consider it as a possible way that MJ1 and MJ2 might have been introduced and utilized thoughout the years. It isn't a firm belief that twins exist but just an open-minded consideration. Afterall anything is possible...

borrowed from wikipedia...
Finally, the hours a child actor may work are limited. Generally, stricter time limits are imposed for younger actors. A very young infant might be allowed "under the lights" only a few minutes a day. It is common in television production for the role of a young child to be portrayed by identical twins or triplets to reduce each child's time on set. When a child turns 18, the legal limits on work time are lifted.

Unfortunately , there was no statement from the wiki page that addressed at what age the doubles are no longer used.

#1 Michael did not write Man In The mirror, nor This Is It.
#2 All magazine photos are retouched in some way. The mirror image was likely photoshopped in from another photo which maybe had a better mirror image but sightly out of focus or unflattering Michael...
This is how photography works. In the full photo you see Michael on all sides=multiple mirrors, not multiple Michaels. Like the photographers would keep such a secret. PUH-LEASE

#3 I realize many people are determined to find proof, determined to keep him alive, to find conspiracy, inconsistancies, etc, but please people, THINK things thoroughly once in a while. Some of the things I've read lately are utterly ridiculous and plainly disregard facts and truths to make way for half assed, ill informed theories that make us all look stupid.
I do believe we are being monitored and I'd like to not only respresent Michael by showing, but show to Michael- what a loyal, clever, well attuned to his lead lot of fans he has on his side. Not a bunch of dellusional idiots unable to cope with his death-as they'd love to make us out to be.

Let's all consider something. We believe in a hoaxed death. Right away, despite our clever and thoughtful research, we are viewed as not too bright. Everything else just falls into play from there.

Some opinions and viewpoints are far-fetched but not to the people who bring them up. A far-fetched thought may trigger someone else to have a more logical or credible one.

People are watching us and most are laughing that there is another generation of hoax believers. The Elvis hoax believers are nothing compared to us for laughs.

SomeoneInTheDarkForMe wrote:#1 Michael did not write Man In The mirror, nor This Is It.
#2 All magazine photos are retouched in some way. The mirror image was likely photoshopped in from another photo which maybe had a better mirror image but sightly out of focus or unflattering Michael...
This is how photography works. In the full photo you see Michael on all sides=multiple mirrors, not multiple Michaels. Like the photographers would keep such a secret. PUH-LEASE

#3 I realize many people are determined to find proof, determined to keep him alive, to find conspiracy, inconsistancies, etc, but please people, THINK things thoroughly once in a while. Some of the things I've read lately are utterly ridiculous and plainly disregard facts and truths to make way for half assed, ill informed theories that make us all look stupid.
I do believe we are being monitored and I'd like to not only respresent Michael by showing, but show to Michael- what a loyal, clever, well attuned to his lead lot of fans he has on his side. Not a bunch of dellusional idiots unable to cope with his death-as they'd love to make us out to be.

i really dont think things are to far fetched if i told you some of the things that have happened to my family you would not believe my friends reckon i should write or book i kow bizare things happen

Great point sweetie!

What is abnormal in Person A's world may be normal in Person B's world and so on. It generally falls on point of reference and perception as to what is considered as far-fetched or odd. That is the beauty of having such a diverse group of people from all over the world. Every point of view may have a crumb of information to lead us in our search for the truth.

SPAKKLE29FUL wrote:i really dont think things are to far fetched if i told you some of the things that have happened to my family you would not believe my friends reckon i should write or book i kow bizare things happen

girlsaturday i fully agree

I didn't mean to sound so mean.
It's not that the theories are far fetched, in themselves, but rather the "proofs" they are built upon.
I think people need to research and ask question before assuming sometimes.
I've seen many, many false "evidences" brought forth, despite it being corrected or addressed previously, on this board.

I know there are others who take this investigation as seriously as I, that seek truth, that may feel as frustrated as I, but are not bold enough to speak their minds.



Again, it's all for love....L.O.V.E

Sweetie you didn't come across as mean ..just frustrated. Guess what? We all are. I just wanted to remind everyone that there are many minds joined together as one.

Right now there are 1291 members. Many may be shy and afraid to share thoughts because they fear that they will be laughed at or criticized. Meanwhile they may have some great ideas and new angles on how to view clues.

We are ONE with ONE goal

Hugs!

SomeoneInTheDarkForMe wrote:I didn't mean to sound so mean.
It's not that the theories are far fetched, in themselves, but rather the "proofs" they are built upon.
I think people need to research and ask question before assuming sometimes.
I've seen many, many false "evidences" brought forth, despite it being corrected or addressed previously, on this board.

I know there are others who take this investigation as seriously as I, that seek truth, that may feel as frustrated as I, but are not bold enough to speak their minds.



Again, it's all for love....L.O.V.E

This reminds me of the whole Michael is Janet or Michael is Latoya thing.
If Michael had a twin Joe Jackson would have put in the Jackson five from the beginning and they would have been the Jackson 6 or 7 since the youngest brother joined the group as well. so it would have been jermaine, marlon, tito, jackie, Randy, Michael and his twin.

But i dont think Michael had a twin. Alot of those pictures Michael's face is either positioned differently so maybe that why some pictures don't match up. One person cant write their signature exactly the same everytime.

also considering Michael did get plastic surgeries every so often and who can pin point when those took place?

well said