Re: Michael did indeed hoax his death/vanish.....but not on June 25th.

by The Little White Bird Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:44 pm

AMAZING. I agree, he only looks the same when he's on tour. Other than that, he looks completely different.
Does
he use doubles for interviews and appearances, and only shows up as
himself when performing? (I think I read that in someone's theory).

To me its not a theory, its a fact. Its a matter of using your eyes! lol

by endlessfire Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:44 pm

It all seems rather perfect to me. I have said it before, He could have used numerous doubles. because anytime he 'changed' people just chalked it up to 'Michael being crazy'. To me his legs looked completely different in the 'You Rock My World' video you posted and all the others. They looked shorter and thicker. MJ has always had long skinny legs. I am with whoever said he could look like anyone. It would be perfect for him to just step back into life, but not as a performer, looking however he wanted to. After all of this he could just say he was a long lost cousin who looks like MJ used who has the same skin disease. No one would really think it was Him because supposedly he died. So watch out for long lost relatives who happen to look like MJ did back in the day. Wink

by phoenix Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:44 pm

Banessa wrote:I don't mean this in any disrespectful way and I don't mean to offend anyone either! I really don't but Seriously guys, are you all kidding me, I can't believe we can't have someone expose a theory and have people get all bent out of shape about it Just because they don't agree! Definition of theory: A speculation and a Hypothesis. In no way does it mean a theory is 100% TRUE! There is no need to jump on each other just because we disagree with someone's point of view! We are here to have discussions but if we can't do it respectfully or w/out getting mad lets just move on! before we hurt each other...Shamoan!!!

I agree that Michael had surgeries but in the interview with Bashir he stated he only had 2 surgeries done. So how can someone's face change so much other then from age and only 2 surgeries were done. Michael stated himself once that we only see what he wanted us to see, when he wanted and how he wanted. He had many doubles and that is not a secret. Will knowing that MJ used a double for the last years make me love him less, Nope. I give him credit for having the courage and the brilliance to pull something like that off and not get caught! Michael you are just amazing...Einstain has nothing on you!!! I love you more!

thank you for this post girl, well done Cool

by GirlInTheMirror1 Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:44 pm

hungry wrote:
The Little White Bird wrote:95% of people are in total agreement that the person we saw at the o2 conference was not Michael Jackson.
If that wasn't Michael Jackson, what would make you so sure that at most of the other times it was him?
I went to his Bad concert and Dangerous tour and i can tell you that after 1993, he not only hasn't looked the same (except during the history tour where he suddenly reverted back to looking exactly the same and then looked weird again straight after) he never performed the same again either (except the history tour)
Look at any footage pre 1993 and compare it to anything after that (except the history tour) Not the same person.
I'm sure that had the 'This is it' tour taken place then the real Michael jackson would have taken to the stage as it looks like him in the clips dancing (but not in any other clips) so therefore either
a: He actually did die
b: the other bloke died,
c: the movie theory is correct or
d: he's still alive but he's stepped out of the spotlight and created himself an impressive Elvis like legacy.

The fact is after 1993, i noticed that whenever MJ was filmed or in the paper, it wasn't him. I may have got used to him as being MJ but it wasn't the same person. Just because you desperately want something to be true, does not make it so. The only person that knows/knew the truth is the man himself.
AMAZING. I agree, he only looks the same when he's on tour. Other than that, he looks completely different.
Does he use doubles for interviews and appearances, and only shows up as himself when performing? (I think I read that in someone's theory).

Could be, as he himself said that the stage is the only place he feels comfortable, and he doesnt like giving interviews and so on...

by Sweet1 Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:45 pm

rowdyangel wrote:
phoenix wrote:i postes a timeline above which i got from some german magazine i believe "stern"

i dont think its MJ everywhere just look at some pictures please

91, 94 and 98 stand out to me in that set of pics. I've taken into account the numerous surgeries throughout the years, but those particular pics just look odd. But that's just my opinion.

Well! 85 and 86 stand out to me. It looks like a completely different person. This was too much of a transition from plastic surgery for such a short period of time. IMO of course. Keep the Faith!

by GirlInTheMirror1 Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:45 pm

endlessfire wrote:It all seems rather perfect to me. I have said it before, He could have used numerous doubles. because anytime he 'changed' people just chalked it up to 'Michael being crazy'. To me his legs looked completely different in the 'You Rock My World' video you posted and all the others. They looked shorter and thicker. MJ has always had long skinny legs. I am with whoever said he could look like anyone. It would be perfect for him to just step back into life, but not as a performer, looking however he wanted to. After all of this he could just say he was a long lost cousin who looks like MJ used who has the same skin disease. No one would really think it was Him because supposedly he died. So watch out for long lost relatives who happen to look like MJ did back in the day.

*Thumbs up!

by Rach Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:47 pm

The Little White Bird wrote:

They were calling him wacko jacko in '88 around the time he turned white, just before bad was released

My apologies! I was only born in 1985!!!

by GirlSaturday Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:47 pm

I know that he was under their scrutiny before '93.

I am merely wondering now if the physical changes and potential presence of other MJ's may have fueled their bullying toward him. When people misunderstand something, they tend to latch onto the first thing that makes sense.

Michael A might have looked differently and had a few different mannersims than Michael B. Since tabloids stalked him, they may have noticed the different look/mannerism yet couldn't explain the difference other than to attack his mental state or personality.

They might NOT have been as advanced as members on this site to delve into possibilities of look-alikes taking on the role of MJ. It might have been above their heads quite honestly. So they limit themselves and look just at his character.

The Little White Bird wrote:
Could these visable changes among the various
MJ's have also fueled rumors and speculation about MJ's mental state of
mind? Tabloids may have noticed physical changes and attributed the
changes more to MJ's character than his body? They may not have been
able to fully pinpoint what was different or "wrong" with MJ. Soooo
they may have naturally taken the cheap shots at his
personality/character/mind because it made for good gossip stories.

To be fair, they were picking on him way before '93 which is probably why he had enough. I think the Jordan Chandler scandle was the icing on the cake

by phoenix Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:47 pm

The Little White Bird wrote:95% of people are in total agreement that the person we saw at the o2 conference was not Michael Jackson.
If that wasn't Michael Jackson, what would make you so sure that at most of the other times it was him?
I went to his Bad concert and Dangerous tour and i can tell you that after 1993, he not only hasn't looked the same (except during the history tour where he suddenly reverted back to looking exactly the same and then looked weird again straight after) he never performed the same again either (except the history tour)
Look at any footage pre 1993 and compare it to anything after that (except the history tour) Not the same person.
I'm sure that had the 'This is it' tour taken place then the real Michael jackson would have taken to the stage as it looks like him in the clips dancing (but not in any other clips) so therefore either
a: He actually did die
b: the other bloke died,
c: the movie theory is correct or
d: he's still alive but he's stepped out of the spotlight and created himself an impressive Elvis like legacy.

The fact is after 1993, i noticed that whenever MJ was filmed or in the paper, it wasn't him. I may have got used to him as being MJ but it wasn't the same person. Just because you desperately want something to be true, does not make it so. The only person that knows/knew the truth is the man himself.

hm interesting thought girl

i personally think that maybe some TII footage was shot after the "death" because it seems to me that they had no other footage before than the "they dont care about us" clip and now at ONCE they have bunch of stuff???

by GirlInTheMirror1 Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:51 pm

phoenix wrote:
The Little White Bird wrote:95% of people are in total agreement that the person we saw at the o2 conference was not Michael Jackson.
If that wasn't Michael Jackson, what would make you so sure that at most of the other times it was him?
I went to his Bad concert and Dangerous tour and i can tell you that after 1993, he not only hasn't looked the same (except during the history tour where he suddenly reverted back to looking exactly the same and then looked weird again straight after) he never performed the same again either (except the history tour)
Look at any footage pre 1993 and compare it to anything after that (except the history tour) Not the same person.
I'm sure that had the 'This is it' tour taken place then the real Michael jackson would have taken to the stage as it looks like him in the clips dancing (but not in any other clips) so therefore either
a: He actually did die
b: the other bloke died,
c: the movie theory is correct or
d: he's still alive but he's stepped out of the spotlight and created himself an impressive Elvis like legacy.

The fact is after 1993, i noticed that whenever MJ was filmed or in the paper, it wasn't him. I may have got used to him as being MJ but it wasn't the same person. Just because you desperately want something to be true, does not make it so. The only person that knows/knew the truth is the man himself.

hm interesting thought girl

i personally think that maybe some TII footage was shot after the "death" because it seems to me that they had no other footage before than the "they dont care about us" clip and now at ONCE they have bunch of stuff???

I think they would say now they have so much stuff because now it´s going to be released officially. The "They don´t care about us"-footage was not official. LoL You know what I mean?

by phoenix Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:54 pm

GirlInTheMirror1 wrote:
phoenix wrote:
The Little White Bird wrote:95% of people are in total agreement that the person we saw at the o2 conference was not Michael Jackson.
If that wasn't Michael Jackson, what would make you so sure that at most of the other times it was him?
I went to his Bad concert and Dangerous tour and i can tell you that after 1993, he not only hasn't looked the same (except during the history tour where he suddenly reverted back to looking exactly the same and then looked weird again straight after) he never performed the same again either (except the history tour)
Look at any footage pre 1993 and compare it to anything after that (except the history tour) Not the same person.
I'm sure that had the 'This is it' tour taken place then the real Michael jackson would have taken to the stage as it looks like him in the clips dancing (but not in any other clips) so therefore either
a: He actually did die
b: the other bloke died,
c: the movie theory is correct or
d: he's still alive but he's stepped out of the spotlight and created himself an impressive Elvis like legacy.

The fact is after 1993, i noticed that whenever MJ was filmed or in the paper, it wasn't him. I may have got used to him as being MJ but it wasn't the same person. Just because you desperately want something to be true, does not make it so. The only person that knows/knew the truth is the man himself.

hm interesting thought girl

i personally think that maybe some TII footage was shot after the "death" because it seems to me that they had no other footage before than the "they dont care about us" clip and now at ONCE they have bunch of stuff???

I think they would say now they have so much stuff because now it´s going to be released officially. The "They don´t care about us"-footage was not official. LoL You know what I mean?

lol you crack me up girl hahahaha

by The Little White Bird Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:55 pm

hm interesting thought girl

i personally
think that maybe some TII footage was shot after the "death" because it
seems to me that they had no other footage before than the "they dont
care about us" clip and now at ONCE they have bunch of stuff???

I've never been called a girl before....damn, i knew i shouldn't have shaved this morning! Wink

He most likely recorded the upcoming film in july.lol

by GirlInTheMirror1 Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:57 pm

The Little White Bird wrote:
hm interesting thought girl

i personally
think that maybe some TII footage was shot after the "death" because it
seems to me that they had no other footage before than the "they dont
care about us" clip and now at ONCE they have bunch of stuff???

I've never been called a girl before....damn, i knew i shouldn't have shaved this morning!

He most likely recorded the upcoming film in july.lol

Haha, hi man/guy!

by phoenix Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:58 pm

The Little White Bird wrote:
hm interesting thought girl

i personally
think that maybe some TII footage was shot after the "death" because it
seems to me that they had no other footage before than the "they dont
care about us" clip and now at ONCE they have bunch of stuff???

I've never been called a girl before....damn, i knew i shouldn't have shaved this morning!

He most likely recorded the upcoming film in july.lol

oh...LOL i am sorry , please forgive me boy :-) i am used that most members are girls

by Guest Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:58 pm

Okey I know that what Rachel started is just a theory, and that is totally fine, I mean thats why we are here. And I think it should go on ofcause, no doubt.

Ive been reading every singel post on this thread, and im getting pretty tired Of Michael beeing rediculed like this. It breaks my heart. Michael did indeed hoax his death/vanish.....but not on June 25th. - Page 3 Icon_sad

Michael has imposters, we all know that, but these imposters has always ONLY Performed in public as Michael, and he has seen them perform as him, many times. BUT.... Michael NEVER ONCE used Imposters to perform for him, at concerts, live or at awards.

Im sorry to say this, but it WAS Michael at the 02 in March. Look at the way he walks, thats the same way he walks at his trial in 2005, where he is wearing his white suit. (Cant find the video on youtube, but I know its there) A walk is like a fingerprint.
I know his voice is diffrent, but it often is.

Im sorry if I offended anyone, but this is just how I feel.
Im not out to start a war or anything, so if someone has a problem with this post, I would like you to consider Pm me, so it wont affect others here on this site, cause I dont want that.

Im sorry for this post, but I needed to say this. There is a reason for me not watching the news, reading tabloids, and listent too the radio, these last 3 months

Please do correct me, if I`m wrong in what I am feeling.

by The Little White Bird Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:01 pm

oh...LOL i am sorry , please forgive me boy :-)

Thats ok, I just shouted 'phwoar' at a picture of Angelina Jolie in a desperate attempt to regain my masculinity!

by Rach Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:02 pm

This is the reason why me and Bidoska didn't know whether this thread was a good idea....because we knew people were going to get upset about it.

We just felt that Michael has changed SO much over the years and only a portion of that can be put down to surgery or age.

We didn't mean to offend and only wanted to share our findings.

by Guest Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:03 pm

Rach wrote:This is the reason why me and Bidoska didn't know whether this thread was a good idea....because we knew people were going to get upset about it.

We just felt that Michael has changed SO much over the years and only a portion of that can be put down to surgery or age.

We didn't mean to offend and only wanted to share our findings.

Its totally fine Sweetheart. It has nothing to do with you. I love you no matter what... remember that Smile

Kisses

by GirlInTheMirror1 Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:05 pm

The Little White Bird wrote:
oh...LOL i am sorry , please forgive me boy :-)

Thats ok, I just shouted 'phwoar' at a picture of Angelina Jolie in a desperate attempt to regain my masculinity!

Haha, you crack me up...Lol

by J.J_loves_MJ Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:11 pm

Rach wrote:This is the reason why me and Bidoska didn't know whether this thread was a good idea....because we knew people were going to get upset about it.

We just felt that Michael has changed SO much over the years and only a portion of that can be put down to surgery or age.

We didn't mean to offend and only wanted to share our findings.

Dont worry, Rach. Its just a theory, after all. Everything is fine.

by phoenix Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:12 pm

The Little White Bird wrote:
oh...LOL i am sorry , please forgive me boy :-)

Thats ok, I just shouted 'phwoar' at a picture of Angelina Jolie in a desperate attempt to regain my masculinity!

that does not proove anything!!! i like her too and i am a girl LOL

by The Little White Bird Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:15 pm

that does not proove anything!!! i like her too and i am a girl LOL

I just shouted 'phwoar' at that message too.... Wink

by phoenix Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:20 pm

The Little White Bird wrote:
that does not proove anything!!! i like her too and i am a girl LOL

I just shouted 'phwoar' at that message too....

LOL typical men ... hey actually its cool to have a guy among us...please do not go to gold pants thread hahahaha

by The Little White Bird Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:28 pm

LOL typical men ... hey actually its cool to have a guy among us...please do not go to gold pants thread hahahaha

Too late, my therapy sessions start in a fortnight.....

by GirlInTheMirror1 Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:29 pm

The Little White Bird wrote:
LOL typical men ... hey actually its cool to have a guy among us...please do not go to gold pants thread hahahaha

Too late, my therapy sessions start in a fortnight.....

LOOOOLLLL; but then at least you´ll have sth to talk about, haha.

by Loree Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:32 pm

Very interesting theory
thanks for sharing Michael did indeed hoax his death/vanish.....but not on June 25th. - Page 3 Icon_pirat

by Rach Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:49 pm

Loree wrote:Very interesting theory
thanks for sharing

You're welcome Smile

I hope it got you thinking!

by Rach Mon Sep 14, 2009 3:07 pm

Sorry guys to pull rank but can we get back to the topic in hand?

Thankies Smile

*hugs*

by phoenix Mon Sep 14, 2009 3:18 pm

no worry i just deleted everything that does not fit in lol

by aamj07 Mon Sep 14, 2009 4:28 pm

I am so glad you gave us the opportunity to read your theory, ladies! It was unlike any other theory I have read so far and it really got me thinking. I agree that only so much of MJ's physical changes can be attributed to plastic surgery. I have always been amazed at how not only his features change, but the actual SHAPE of his face changes as well. It's easy to change your features but to change the structure and shape of your face is nearly impossible. (ok I get that you can get facial implants, etc, but come on...these changes are just too much.)
Thank you again ladies for sharing!
Oh, and I also have to agree that some of the pics on the timeline that was posted from the magazine seem to be out of date order...?

by CantStopLovingU Mon Sep 14, 2009 4:59 pm

phoenix wrote:
The Little White Bird wrote:95% of people are in total agreement that the person we saw at the o2 conference was not Michael Jackson.
If that wasn't Michael Jackson, what would make you so sure that at most of the other times it was him?
I went to his Bad concert and Dangerous tour and i can tell you that after 1993, he not only hasn't looked the same (except during the history tour where he suddenly reverted back to looking exactly the same and then looked weird again straight after) he never performed the same again either (except the history tour)
Look at any footage pre 1993 and compare it to anything after that (except the history tour) Not the same person.
I'm sure that had the 'This is it' tour taken place then the real Michael jackson would have taken to the stage as it looks like him in the clips dancing (but not in any other clips) so therefore either
a: He actually did die
b: the other bloke died,
c: the movie theory is correct or
d: he's still alive but he's stepped out of the spotlight and created himself an impressive Elvis like legacy.

The fact is after 1993, i noticed that whenever MJ was filmed or in the paper, it wasn't him. I may have got used to him as being MJ but it wasn't the same person. Just because you desperately want something to be true, does not make it so. The only person that knows/knew the truth is the man himself.

hm interesting thought girl

i personally think that maybe some TII footage was shot after the "death" because it seems to me that they had no other footage before than the "they dont care about us" clip and now at ONCE they have bunch of stuff???

So much truth to everything you said. Especially if you can connect the tour performances including history and what Michael looked like during History compared to what he looked like when he was out in public.

Someone else noted that it is well know that in the year(s) that followed the Jordy case, MJ was known as a recluse. Something was going on. Think back to the Diane Sawyer interview with Michael and Lisa I always thought that the MJ was saw during that interview didnt look like the MJ we saw on MTV or the You are not alone video either.

The Informant, a.k.a Elusive Chicken Guy started to give some good information, and of course the MJHD folks ran him off too.

We need more insight from him. He definately said to look at the perfomances, interviews, appearances starting in the 1990's and to LOOK for Inconsistencies in Michaels LIFE from that point on.

Edited to add that I also saw descrepancies in the MJ we saw in the TTI trailor. Some looked just like the MJ we KNOW, and some looked wierd and off. and I wouldnt put it PAST THEM to use a double for shots they couldnt get prior to 6/25

by Rach Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:04 pm

aamj07 wrote:I am so glad you gave us the opportunity to read your theory, ladies! It was unlike any other theory I have read so far and it really got me thinking. I agree that only so much of MJ's physical changes can be attributed to plastic surgery. I have always been amazed at how not only his features change, but the actual SHAPE of his face changes as well. It's easy to change your features but to change the structure and shape of your face is nearly impossible. (ok I get that you can get facial implants, etc, but come on...these changes are just too much.)
Thank you again ladies for sharing!
Oh, and I also have to agree that some of the pics on the timeline that was posted from the magazine seem to be out of date order...?

You're welcome Honey!

I'm glad it made you think because that was the object of the whole thing. Me and Bidoska both feel that in order to see the bigger picture you have to stop focusing on the present or the last few years and take a step back and look at this from a long time ago, when the changes started to appear. Smile

by aamj07 Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:28 pm

Rach wrote:
aamj07 wrote:I am so glad you gave us the opportunity to read your theory, ladies! It was unlike any other theory I have read so far and it really got me thinking. I agree that only so much of MJ's physical changes can be attributed to plastic surgery. I have always been amazed at how not only his features change, but the actual SHAPE of his face changes as well. It's easy to change your features but to change the structure and shape of your face is nearly impossible. (ok I get that you can get facial implants, etc, but come on...these changes are just too much.)
Thank you again ladies for sharing!
Oh, and I also have to agree that some of the pics on the timeline that was posted from the magazine seem to be out of date order...?

You're welcome Honey!

I'm glad it made you think because that was the object of the whole thing. Me and Bidoska both feel that in order to see the bigger picture you have to stop focusing on the present or the last few years and take a step back and look at this from a long time ago, when the changes started to appear.

I agree 100%! I think that I, along with many others, have been so distracted with everything that has happened in the present rather than taking a look at things that could've led up to this years ago. I'm glad you guys provided a theory that allows us to take a step outside the box! Every time I read a new theory it makes me look at this "case" in a different way. Which is why I LOVE this site! (nudge, nudge...lol) Michael did indeed hoax his death/vanish.....but not on June 25th. - Page 3 Icon_wink

by Rach Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:31 pm

LOL what's with the nudge nudge wink wink thing?!

by aamj07 Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:46 pm

Oh, just trying to remind you how much you love this forum & everyone in it, and that you can't possibly stay away!! lol

by GirlInTheMirror1 Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:24 am

As we are talking of changes, do you think the change of skin color has sth to do with it? I mean, I really believe he had vitiligo.. Right? Urgh, I´m a bit confused, sorry.

by DreamsComeTrue Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:34 am

GirlInTheMirror1 wrote:As we are talking of changes, do you think the change of skin color has sth to do with it? I mean, I really believe he had vitiligo.. Right? Urgh, I´m a bit confused, sorry.

Yes, he has vitiligo!
Look at this video! It will convince you! Michael did indeed hoax his death/vanish.....but not on June 25th. - Page 3 Icon_rr

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15TSEKXXIvI

by GirlInTheMirror1 Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:43 am

DreamsComeTrue wrote:
GirlInTheMirror1 wrote:As we are talking of changes, do you think the change of skin color has sth to do with it? I mean, I really believe he had vitiligo.. Right? Urgh, I´m a bit confused, sorry.

Yes, he has vitiligo!
Look at this video! It will convince you!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15TSEKXXIvI

Yeah, I know he has, I just mean, if this could have sth to do with the vanishing/hoaxing/whatever... Michael did indeed hoax his death/vanish.....but not on June 25th. - Page 3 Icon_biggrin

by Red Velvet Tue Sep 15, 2009 6:11 am

Rach I'm not sure what to think about any of it tbh. Mike hasn't quite looked consistently the same since the 80s.

In the 2004 Geraldo interview he looks nothing like the guy who was talking to Bashir in either Cali/Vegas or Miami but I feel sure they are all Mike.

Sometimes I think he's like a koleidescope (sp) that changes at every turn.

The Barbara Walters interview Mike was a little like the Diane Sawyer Mike but not very much but it was just a 'syle' difference I guess.

The TV Guide Mike looked nothing like the Madison Square Garden Mike to me ... he just hasn't looked CONSISTENTLY quite like 'himself' since the early - mid 80s... but still somehow unmistakably 'Mike'

by GirlInTheMirror1 Tue Sep 15, 2009 6:15 am

I get what you mean, red velvet, but still.. I am not sure. I think they have a point. Because, I agree with you that all the "Mikes" look like himself, compared to a late 80s/early 90s-Mike. But compared to each other, there are so many differences, even if it all could be Mike...

by Red Velvet Tue Sep 15, 2009 6:18 am

I know, there really are, so many differences. It would be so funny if MJ began 'punking' the world a long time ago and all these siggys and avatars are of all different people! Laughing

by GirlInTheMirror1 Tue Sep 15, 2009 6:22 am

Red Velvet wrote:I know, there really are, so many differences. It would be so funny if MJ began 'punking' the world a long time ago and all these siggys and avatars are of all different people!

Haha, right (I love all mjs, but especially the give-in-to-me one...I hope that´s him, haha. Actually I dont´care how he looks like, of course, I love him anyway).
And imagine, he comes back and looks totally different as we expect him to. LoL

by Rach Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:45 pm

I have been thinking about the vitiligo and that's what throws me a little bit. I do have some thoughts on the subject but I will get lynched so I don't really want to post them on here Michael did indeed hoax his death/vanish.....but not on June 25th. - Page 3 Icon_redface

by PepaBCN Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:51 pm

What a madness... Michael did indeed hoax his death/vanish.....but not on June 25th. - Page 3 Icon_evil

by nlb Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:56 pm

Red Velvet wrote:I know, there really are, so many differences. It would be so funny if MJ began 'punking' the world a long time ago and all these siggys and avatars are of all different people!

After reading this theory, I had that very same thought! I do agree about the HIStory tour, he did look the same each time. Good job on the theory guys and thanks for sharing it.

by mjj29081958 Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:30 pm

Rach wrote:I have been thinking about the vitiligo and that's what throws me a little bit. I do have some thoughts on the subject but I will get lynched so I don't really want to post them on here

Well, all who have posted here have assumed the risk!!!!!

Now seriously, is a bit sad that you don't feel free to share your opinion here Michael did indeed hoax his death/vanish.....but not on June 25th. - Page 3 Icon_cry

, but (fortunately) lately I have not seen people attacking people here (or maybe I lost it!).
Anyway, I really love to hear your thoughts about that, only if you want it!! Michael did indeed hoax his death/vanish.....but not on June 25th. - Page 3 Icon_bounce

Hugs!
Sorry my english!

by CantlivewithoutMJ Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:34 pm

Rach wrote:Sorry guys to pull rank but can we get back to the topic in hand?

Thankies *hugs*

Rachieee

by GirlSaturday Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:24 pm

Not by me you won't...lol.
Let's just say that I have some thoughts on that subject as well. Michael did indeed hoax his death/vanish.....but not on June 25th. - Page 3 Icon_twisted

Michael did indeed hoax his death/vanish.....but not on June 25th. - Page 3 Lol

BTW - One of my thoughts is 18+. PM if you want to but please consider yourself warned...

Rach wrote:I have been thinking about the vitiligo and that's what throws me a little bit. I do have some thoughts on the subject but I will get lynched so I don't really want to post them on here

by Rach Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:26 pm

OMG Cheryl I am so PMing you to see what your 18+ thought is - although I think I know what it may be Michael did indeed hoax his death/vanish.....but not on June 25th. - Page 3 Icon_redface

by GirlSaturday Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:36 pm

Cheryl? Who the hell is Cheryl? Michael did indeed hoax his death/vanish.....but not on June 25th. - Page 3 Lol

Trust me, you guys do not want to meet her. Michael did indeed hoax his death/vanish.....but not on June 25th. - Page 3 Icon_twisted

Rach wrote:OMG Cheryl I am so PMing you to see what your 18+ thought is - although I think I know what it may be

by Sponsored content