IF it's a Hoax: Dr. Klein

If it's a hoax, many people have talked about how MJ might be trying to get back at the media and set the record straight on a lot of things, ultimately making them all look like fools and reclaiming his reputation.

IF it's a hoax... and IF Dr. Klein is involved with it... Dr. Klein could have set himself up as a "possible biological father" to the kids, knowing that MJ is the real bio father. If Klein fights for custody or visitation or anything like that, he'll have to have some kind of proof that he is somehow eligible for this. Which is where paternity testing comes in.

If paternity tests happen they could be done to prove once and for all that those ARE MJ's biological children. Which would put to rest one of many rumors that has circulated around MJ for years.

Thoughts?

yes I agree with u - his reason for challenging Katherine and Rowe to have some visitations rights or somethin of Prince and Paris seemed somewhat believable but not 100% (he apparently said that Michael wanted to make sure that Joe stays away from the kids and wished he would look out for the three Jackson kids).

I mean it would be so great to see the looks on those who doubted Michael as the biological father of the kids (ie.. the media) when the paternity tests com back to prove them wrong three cheers for sweet revenge I say!! lol

I don't think it matters one way or the other if those are his bio kids, they're obviously still his kids. BUT I do believe all those kids look like Michael. Paris not as much, but Paris IMO looks a lot like her aunt Janet. Plus those kids being so "white" is no indication of anything. They're very dark complected for "white kids" and MJ has some white in his family tree, that combined with a white mother is likely going to make "white" more dominant. I think a lot of people who say things against those being MJ's kids haven't seen a lot of bi-racial children. They look bi-racial to me.

i now believe that they are 100% michael's....someone posted a thread on the other forum that suggested that prince mau have virtiligo...i googled it and relised it may actually be true..he does have the discolorations..*shrugs* i dont know

...do you know Boris Becker's
Boris Becker's children (picture for example)? They have far more facial features of a black person than a white one's because these genes are dominant and siblings will always look more negroid than white...

If I(!) compare the faces of Blanket, Paris and Prince with the "whiter" Michael with an operated nose - you are right, they look like him. But don't forget: Michael's genotype is dark and the nose wide - I can't see these features in the children's faces. And most: In none of them - they look like their father in his older years but not in his early Twens - before the operations began.

MY OPINION - I will await the test results...

PS: One picture of his daughter with another coloured woman.

emo_pinkt wrote:i now believe that they are 100% michael's....someone posted a thread on the other forum that suggested that prince mau have virtiligo...i googled it and relised it may actually be true..he does have the discolorations..*shrugs* i dont know

Yeah, I saw that post at MJHD, too, and while I don't want to be mean, there's no way for me to say what's on my mind without coming off as bitchy: I wish everybody would just STOP speculating about Michael Jackson's children, for goodness sakes, particularly when it comes to a serious medical condition like vitiglio.

And just for the record: Anybody who thinks Prince I is showing signs of vitglio is mighty desperate to see what they want to see. You can't tell ANYthing about his pigmentation from the photos people keep analyzing to death, so please just quit it, already.

The last thing Michael Jackson and his family members need is for complete strangers to insist on trying to coming up with bizarre medical diagnoses for his children, whom they've probably never even met or seen in person before. Leave the kids alone, please, and stop drawing them into this supremely weird public speculation that their father still has to endure.

Thank you.

morla wrote:...do you know Boris Becker's
Boris Becker's children (picture for example)? They have far more facial features of a black person than a white one's because these genes are dominant and siblings will always look more negroid than white...

If I(!) compare the faces of Blanket, Paris and Prince with the "whiter" Michael with an operated nose - you are right, they look like him. But don't forget: Michael's genotype is dark and the nose wide - I can't see these features in the children's faces. And most: In none of them - they look like their father in his older years but not in his early Twens - before the operations began.

MY OPINION - I will await the test results...

PS: One picture of his daughter with another coloured woman.

I think those kids look like their dad WHEN HE WAS A KID, not since the plastic surgery.

Here are a couple of videos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4uiPHtMSpM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6QzPhHxlu0


I don't think those kids look anything like post-plastic surgery michael. They look like him before the surgery, IMO.

Lorrie wrote:

emo_pinkt wrote:i now believe that they are 100% michael's....someone posted a thread on the other forum that suggested that prince mau have virtiligo...i googled it and relised it may actually be true..he does have the discolorations..*shrugs* i dont know

Yeah, I saw that post at MJHD, too, and while I don't want to be mean, there's no way for me to say what's on my mind without coming off as bitchy: I wish everybody would just STOP speculating about Michael Jackson's children, for goodness sakes, particularly when it comes to a serious medical condition like vitiglio.

And just for the record: Anybody who thinks Prince I is showing signs of vitglio is mighty desperate to see what they want to see. You can't tell ANYthing about his pigmentation from the photos people keep analyzing to death, so please just quit it, already.

The last thing Michael Jackson and his family members need is for complete strangers to insist on trying to coming up with bizarre medical diagnoses for his children, whom they've probably never even met or seen in person before. Leave the kids alone, please, and stop drawing them into this supremely weird public speculation that their father still has to endure.

Thank you.

sure looks that way to me when you look closely...but im sorry anyways if u are offended

Lorrie wrote:

emo_pinkt wrote:i now believe that they are 100% michael's....someone posted a thread on the other forum that suggested that prince mau have virtiligo...i googled it and relised it may actually be true..he does have the discolorations..*shrugs* i dont know

Yeah, I saw that post at MJHD, too, and while I don't want to be mean, there's no way for me to say what's on my mind without coming off as bitchy: I wish everybody would just STOP speculating about Michael Jackson's children, for goodness sakes, particularly when it comes to a serious medical condition like vitiglio.

And just for the record: Anybody who thinks Prince I is showing signs of vitglio is mighty desperate to see what they want to see. You can't tell ANYthing about his pigmentation from the photos people keep analyzing to death, so please just quit it, already.

The last thing Michael Jackson and his family members need is for complete strangers to insist on trying to coming up with bizarre medical diagnoses for his children, whom they've probably never even met or seen in person before. Leave the kids alone, please, and stop drawing them into this supremely weird public speculation that their father still has to endure.

Thank you.

Actually there IS a photo out there that shows pigmentation issues that can't really be mistaken for anything BUT vitiligo. The real question is whether or not the picture was photoshopped. If the photograph is genuine, then I would say he does have it.

mjfan wrote:

Lorrie wrote:

emo_pinkt wrote:i now believe that they are 100% michael's....someone posted a thread on the other forum that suggested that prince mau have virtiligo...i googled it and relised it may actually be true..he does have the discolorations..*shrugs* i dont know

Yeah, I saw that post at MJHD, too, and while I don't want to be mean, there's no way for me to say what's on my mind without coming off as bitchy: I wish everybody would just STOP speculating about Michael Jackson's children, for goodness sakes, particularly when it comes to a serious medical condition like vitiglio.

And just for the record: Anybody who thinks Prince I is showing signs of vitglio is mighty desperate to see what they want to see. You can't tell ANYthing about his pigmentation from the photos people keep analyzing to death, so please just quit it, already.

The last thing Michael Jackson and his family members need is for complete strangers to insist on trying to coming up with bizarre medical diagnoses for his children, whom they've probably never even met or seen in person before. Leave the kids alone, please, and stop drawing them into this supremely weird public speculation that their father still has to endure.

Thank you.

Actually there IS a photo out there that shows pigmentation issues that can't really be mistaken for anything BUT vitiligo. The real question is whether or not the picture was photoshopped. If the photograph is genuine, then I would say he does have it.

I was wondering the same thing too..Im actually looking for the pic to see if i was wrong..Like a picture from the same time

mjfan wrote:

morla wrote:...do you know Boris Becker's
Boris Becker's children (picture for example)? They have far more facial features of a black person than a white one's because these genes are dominant and siblings will always look more negroid than white...

If I(!) compare the faces of Blanket, Paris and Prince with the "whiter" Michael with an operated nose - you are right, they look like him. But don't forget: Michael's genotype is dark and the nose wide - I can't see these features in the children's faces. And most: In none of them - they look like their father in his older years but not in his early Twens - before the operations began.

MY OPINION - I will await the test results...

PS: One picture of his daughter with another coloured woman.

I think those kids look like their dad WHEN HE WAS A KID, not since the plastic surgery.

Here are a couple of videos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4uiPHtMSpM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6QzPhHxlu0


I don't think those kids look anything like post-plastic surgery michael. They look like him before the surgery, IMO.

I watched the first video and have to admit that on the MEMORIAL they looked the most similar to him - in contrast to the pictures of them as small children (perhaps they helped a bit with make-up, if we discuss the whole thing as "staged" (and it is summer - children are likely to play outside ) .

And in the video was Boris Becker used as example for their point of view - I use it against it because of my presented arguments.

But I don't want to offend anyone - draw your own
conclusions .