HOW COME JANET ARVIZO never WENT TO JAIL??

How come that woman was allowed to extort michael and have her son LIE and accuse Michael of that horrible thing and they just walked away from the whole thing?

SHE went on shopping sprees, and salon visits charging everything to michael's bill, the whole family took over the house treating the staff like they had the right to everything that was Michaels. They stole from him, destroyed the guest house and the filed a false report.

Why were THEY able to walk away after everything they did to him???

They only comfort I take in all this is that THEY WILL Reap what they sowed. All the pain and lies they heaped on Michael will come back on them 100 fold.

What really happened at Neverland.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yeq0kM4uywk&feature=player_profilepage

Because prosecuting her for false testimony would have proven that the district attorney made a mistake when they charged and indicted Michael.

It's all politics.

that's a really great question! I have no idea.. because even if Michael didn't counter sue, I am sure due to lying under oath, something should have happened legally to them..

anybody know what should have happened??

I'm wondering where are all those kids that MJ helped? All these cancer patients, all those dying, all those ailing kids that he allowed to sleep in his bedroom. Why aren't they coming our to defend MJ? They are adults by now and can make decisions of their own. I appreciate Dave Dave, but, he's not the only one that MJ helped. Where are the others? Why aren't they coming out and tell their story thereby vindicating MJ. Because, up to now, there are still people out there who are calling MJ a pedo! And those kids can do a lot to clear MJ's name!

I can't believe that there were no repercussions for that family. But then again it was quite obvious that Tom sneddon had a Vendetta against Michael, and pursuing legal action against the family could have made things difficult for him.

some legal system!

charlie.smile.chaplin wrote:I'm wondering where are all those kids that MJ helped? All these cancer patients, all those dying, all those ailing kids that he allowed to sleep in his bedroom. Why aren't they coming our to defend MJ? They are adults by now and can make decisions of their own. I appreciate Dave Dave, but, he's not the only one that MJ helped. Where are the others? Why aren't they coming out and tell their story thereby vindicating MJ. Because, up to now, there are still people out there who are calling MJ a pedo! And those kids can do a lot to clear MJ's name!

Basic reciprocal courtesy; I wondered about that question, too. Most of the planet understands that MJ was falsely accused. Maybe some of these kids/adults are still sick. Maybe they just needed to be asked and nobody asked them. Maybe they needed a forum to voice their gratitude and maybe they didn't know where to go. Maybe they thought about it but decided against it because some people might think that they were trying to 'steal' into the MJ 'spotlight'. The maybe's could go on and on...

MJ helpe these kids out of the goodness of his heart. MJ handlers failed this opportunity to provide a vehicle/ forum for these people to express their gratitude. Letters and cards would probably would have sufficed. MJ handlers could have simply provided a simple had a booth on site for people to fill in 'thank you cards' or taken cards with them to mail in later.

The opportunity still exists for someone to take this on_better late than never!

CantStopLovingU wrote:How come that woman was allowed to extort michael and have her son LIE and accuse Michael of that horrible thing and they just walked away from the whole thing?

SHE went on shopping sprees, and salon visits charging everything to michael's bill, the whole family took over the house treating the staff like they had the right to everything that was Michaels. They stole from him, destroyed the guest house and the filed a false report.

Why were THEY able to walk away after everything they did to him???

They only comfort I take in all this is that THEY WILL Reap what they sowed. All the pain and lies they heaped on Michael will come back on them 100 fold.

What really happened at Neverland.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yeq0kM4uywk&feature=player_profilepage

I've always wondered this question as well. It just doesn't seem fair. MJ had to endure all the horrible months of that trial, and pay millions of dollars to defend himself. It just seems so wrong that you can accuse anyone of anything with no repercussions. Tom Sneddon should be culpable too...he and the Arvizo's should both be rotting in prison.

ILuvUMoreMJ wrote:

CantStopLovingU wrote:How come that woman was allowed to extort michael and have her son LIE and accuse Michael of that horrible thing and they just walked away from the whole thing?

SHE went on shopping sprees, and salon visits charging everything to michael's bill, the whole family took over the house treating the staff like they had the right to everything that was Michaels. They stole from him, destroyed the guest house and the filed a false report.

Why were THEY able to walk away after everything they did to him???

They only comfort I take in all this is that THEY WILL Reap what they sowed. All the pain and lies they heaped on Michael will come back on them 100 fold.

What really happened at Neverland.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yeq0kM4uywk&feature=player_profilepage

I've always wondered this question as well. It just doesn't seem fair. MJ had to endure all the horrible months of that trial, and pay millions of dollars to defend himself. It just seems so wrong that you can accuse anyone of anything with no repercussions. Tom Sneddon should be culpable too...he and the Arvizo's should both be rotting in prison.

Maybe because nobody filed charges against them. Even to this day, MJ's immediate family members are just out there to reap money, not very concerned of vindicating MJ's name.

annieisnotokey wrote:Because prosecuting her for false testimony would have proven that the district attorney made a mistake when they charged and indicted Michael.

It's all politics.

I think you hit the nail on the head there! I totally agree.

And why would Michael want to counter-sue anyway? He had just endured 2 years of H-E-L-L because of the Arvizos. Another court proceeding would have just dragged on even longer. He'd spent hundreds of thousands of dollars (not millions) on his legal defense and would just have to spend more in order to sue. He'd lost his love for Neverland, a place that was his source of solace and solitude for years. If you look at any pictures or video of MJ from during the trial period, it is painfully obvious the extent of the damage there was to Michael's physical health, and to his spirit. The pain was written all over his face and his eyes. I seriously don't think he would have survived another court proceeding, especially involving the Arvizos. Just my opinion though.

@annie

I agree, that´s the most plausible reason I think. It usually is politics behind everything.

I dont know about the USA but here in the Uk it is criminal to falsely accuse someone and to waste valuable police time etc and is prosecutable, the one found not guilty does not have to do anything as the accuser will be charged. Maybe because it was a minor nothing was done? It possibly would be hard to prove that anyone put the boy up to it.

I agree with both of you. But believe that ppl may get away on earth but in the end all must die and stand before the throne of judgement. MJ is a kind hearted person and wouldn't hurt a fly. For the ones that he helped that didn't speak up in his defense they are living their hell on a daily basis. Unjust never prospers, ever! and you will always reap what you sow in life. Keep the Faith!

Christiana wrote:

annieisnotokey wrote:Because prosecuting her for false testimony would have proven that the district attorney made a mistake when they charged and indicted Michael.

It's all politics.

I think you hit the nail on the head there! I totally agree.

And why would Michael want to counter-sue anyway? He had just endured 2 years of H-E-L-L because of the Arvizos. Another court proceeding would have just dragged on even longer. He'd spent hundreds of thousands of dollars (not millions) on his legal defense and would just have to spend more in order to sue. He'd lost his love for Neverland, a place that was his source of solace and solitude for years. If you look at any pictures or video of MJ from during the trial period, it is painfully obvious the extent of the damage there was to Michael's physical health, and to his spirit. The pain was written all over his face and his eyes. I seriously don't think he would have survived another court proceeding, especially involving the Arvizos. Just my opinion though.

[quote="Sweet1"]I agree with both of you. But believe that ppl may get away on earth but in the end all must die and stand before the throne of judgement. MJ is a kind hearted person and wouldn't hurt a fly. For the ones that he helped that didn't speak up in his defense they are living their hell on a daily basis. Unjust never prospers, ever! and you will always reap what you sow in life. Keep the Faith!


[quote="Christiana"]

annieisnotokey wrote:Because prosecuting her for false testimony would have proven that the district attorney made a mistake when they charged and indicted Michael.

It's all politics.

So true but unfortunately all who didn't speak up in his defence-do they have a coincence at all? I shouln't think so. Unjust never prospers-yes is true but I wish that were so easy, try telling that to the parents of a murdered child in the UK when the murderer get life and it ends up being 12 years or even less with good behaviour. Fair? No it isn't. There are too many do-gooders who blame the upbringing etc for unspeakable acts of violence and greed jnstead of seeing the evil. Yes they will see judgement day but in the meantime people on this earth have to suffer for their evil acts. Michael could have ended up years in prison and hated by many. It would have finished him.