The Mike J Jackson ~ Michael J Jackson thing again - Interes

New blog:
http://souza-mjhoaxdeath-themovietheory.blogspot.com/2009/11/mike-j-jackson-michael-j-jackson-thing.html

so its the same person, Michael Jackson?

nellyka7 wrote:so its the same person, Michael Jackson?

Idk, I don't think so, but this points out that the listing in the SSDI is bogus..

It´s interesting... who is this Mike J.? Is it MJ himself? Because...what about the different birth date? I´m sorry.. don´t get it...

WHATTT???? Ok I am all for it-but I am a bit lost,how do you come to the conclusion that they gave MJ another birthday so it would be a fake of a fake? I totally missed how you cemented that conclusion...

neverlandprincess wrote: WHATTT???? Ok I am all for it-but I am a bit lost,how do you come to the conclusion that they gave MJ another birthday so it would be a fake of a fake? I totally missed how you cemented that conclusion...

No, I think it are 2 different persons, that is why it's a fake. SS# from person 1 and name of person 2 = nobody dead.

I think Mike J Jackson is a cousin.

Souza81 wrote:

neverlandprincess wrote: WHATTT???? Ok I am all for it-but I am a bit lost,how do you come to the conclusion that they gave MJ another birthday so it would be a fake of a fake? I totally missed how you cemented that conclusion...

No, I think it are 2 different persons, that is why it's a fake. SS# from person 1 and name of person 2 = nobody dead.

I think Mike J Jackson is a cousin.

Thats what I meant but ...how and what makes you think that?

Souza81 wrote:

neverlandprincess wrote: WHATTT???? Ok I am all for it-but I am a bit lost,how do you come to the conclusion that they gave MJ another birthday so it would be a fake of a fake? I totally missed how you cemented that conclusion...

No, I think it are 2 different persons, that is why it's a fake. SS# from person 1 and name of person 2 = nobody dead.

I think Mike J Jackson is a cousin.

That would be interesting...

GirlInTheMirror1 wrote:

Souza81 wrote:

neverlandprincess wrote: WHATTT???? Ok I am all for it-but I am a bit lost,how do you come to the conclusion that they gave MJ another birthday so it would be a fake of a fake? I totally missed how you cemented that conclusion...

No, I think it are 2 different persons, that is why it's a fake. SS# from person 1 and name of person 2 = nobody dead.

I think Mike J Jackson is a cousin.

That would be interesting...

plausible

WOW,now this makes alot of sense.great investigating.and great reporting. thanks so much

I agree, there are two Mj's... I have always thought "twin" but it could also be somone else within that family no doubt about it.But you say niether died? Is that cuz of the SS# numbers being valid?

ok...to set record right on his Birth date...he was born 1958 "death" 2009...so I don't see the dates being wrong

SunShine wrote:ok...to set record right on his Birth date...he was born 1958 "death" 2009...so I don't see the dates being wrong

me neither.. im kinda confused..

I hate to look at numbers, when I see numbers I get confused!

mo2kidzs wrote:I agree, there are two Mj's... I have always thought "twin" but it could also be somone else within that family no doubt about it.But you say niether died? Is that cuz of the SS# numbers being valid?

Idk if the number is valid, but it redirects to this Mike J Jackson, born August 8, 1958, and not to Michael, also Mike J Jackson is not listed as dead. It's just a big mess, but if you put the pieces together, no one died.

August 8th, 1958? Weird!

All of this does nothing but confuse me. I see what you're saying, but I don't see how it proves the SSDI is wrong. It seems that the dates are correct on the SSDI, and would be a more reliable/credible source than Intelius or other search services. Are the birth/"death" dates wrong on the SSDI? Is the SS # wrong on the SSDI? This is what I'm trying to understand.

To me, the SSDI being right would not prove MJ is dead. That "death" would have to be registered there to prove to the world that he is dead, even if he's not. And since I believe that if the hoax is real, he did it because he was in danger or for some other very important reason, the "death" would have to be as legitimate and convincing as possible. So it would have to be registered in the SSDI.

I have also looked into this.

My conclusion led me to question the wording in the Will: "I nominate Diana Ross".....

Check into that!

Diana Ross was born, Diane Ernestine Earle Ross.

Diana is a stage name!

Its a stage name but it is what she is known by for my gosh what 50 years?

MJ_Fan_For_40_yrs wrote:I have also looked into this.

My conclusion led me to question the wording in the Will: "I nominate Diana Ross".....

Check into that!

:~* TAG........*~:

Hmmm It's a legal doc, so it should have Diana's legal name on it, right?

Mike J would be Michael's twin brother then right? (I'm talking about the previous blog entries) if I've read your blog good then that is what you're saying right Souza?

Or do you mean that someone with the name name as Michael died but not our Michael?

MJLover1990 wrote:Mike J would be Michael's twin brother then right? (I'm talking about the previous blog entries) if I've read your blog good then that is what you're saying right Souza?

Or do you mean that someone with the name name as Michael died but not our Michael?

I guess what Souza meant is that it could be a cousin.

GirlInTheMirror1 wrote:

MJLover1990 wrote:Mike J would be Michael's twin brother then right? (I'm talking about the previous blog entries) if I've read your blog good then that is what you're saying right Souza?

Or do you mean that someone with the name name as Michael died but not our Michael?

I guess what Souza meant is that it could be a cousin.

Ah okay, I knew I understood it wrong haha

I am totally lost now. What's Diana Ross got to do with SSN and different birthdates?

mjssoulmate wrote:I am totally lost now. What's Diana Ross got to do with SSN and different birthdates?

I think it has to do with Michael's will from 2002 but for the rest I'm lost too now

Nice blogs !

I think Souza is really onto something , I think it really is a hoax within the hoax ...complicated and all, but I think she is very close to the truth !

Souza81 wrote:

neverlandprincess wrote: WHATTT???? Ok I am all for it-but I am a bit lost,how do you come to the conclusion that they gave MJ another birthday so it would be a fake of a fake? I totally missed how you cemented that conclusion...

No, I think it are 2 different persons, that is why it's a fake. SS# from person 1 and name of person 2 = nobody dead.

I think Mike J Jackson is a cousin.

ok so i never seen this topic but now it makes more sense...

when i read the blog i was thinking..this doesnt make sense...different dob..and then all these "extra" jacksons that are listed like gabriel , billy jean, alysn and trent...then it hit me..when tito did his interview he said

"when i called my mom trent answered the phone, thats my mothers right hand man.."

which makes me think that these extra people listed are joes neices/nephews hints the same last name..including mike?

plus everone keeps saying "vitiligo runs on josephs side"

and if i recall joes brother has hella kids also...so idk whats going on and who is who as far as the voice ect but this is more reason to by this theory since there not birth twins...

Boy you guys make things really confusing, lol...I think what Souza means is that the social security number listed for Michael for Michael's death is actually the social security number for the other Michael J jackson born on august 8th...therefore our Michael is really alive...am I right Souza?