Needing Some Help,Important!Missing S, Red Shirt, Round Ear,Curly hair in 2006!!THIS IS NOT IT!

Since for some odd reason I can not do comments anymore on MJHD, I will place a few things, I puzzled together.All them after read the amazing Hasil´s post about the ears , plus Rachel´s one concerning him being overseas already, and also the incredible finds from Souza : http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxdeath.com/?page_id=293/hoax-death/mj-and-david-blaine-rehearsal-picture-is-big-clue/#p5789

And also HanaDay:
http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxdeath.com/?page_id=293/hoax-death/lies-lies-more-lies-rehearsal/#p57886



So just to start, I hate really hate to say OMG OMG OMG but I needed to...Cause I found out, the media have been using the Picture of Smooth Criminal as part of the last rehearsal, cause Mike is not Just wearing the same pair of pants, but also an identical (to not say the very same one)red shirt, from the They Dont Care About Us vídeo footage.

(Please I dont know how to place pictures ,can someone be so gentle to copy them from the sites, and show they here also?)

Anyway, if you look to the neck line, and the piece of silk near the coat you will see its red.And also zooming the image we can see the patterns on the chest , they are exactly the same. Another interesting thing, is, Timor on the picture from Smooth Criminal with the
dancers, is using the same white stripped loose pants on the Smooth Criminal sketch (from 3 years ago according with the David´s Blaine article), he shows on the video on Staples Centre last rehearsal.


So if they had published it on 2006, the REHEARSAL from 23^rd never even EXISTED.It´d
explain the photoshop from THIS IS IT with the missing “S” on the screen, cause
you can see the same damn screen on the picture where they are performing Smooth Criminal , tough with instead of THIS IS IT on it , we have buildings and city lights.


Now we finally got an explanation why the dancer once said on a tweet that: THIS IS NOT IT,
cause seems indeed never had any THIS IS IT!And why Mike was looking younger,
and with round ear, cause simply, he was 3 years younger O.o!All this prior Klein work back on his nose!


We need to contact the website about David Blaine ,and seek if it was really published back on 2006 with those same pics from Smooth Criminal, cause if they were, we have the final proof that THIS IS IT never meant to be!!!Also we need to ask them why the HELL NOT JUST MIKE but Timor as well are wearing the same clothes of 3 years ago!


OMG!



PS:The only question that will remain is about the crew staff, how come they were the same
from the audiction performed in march…Just if ,they were already pre-selected,
as the cast from the movie, and the audiction was also another staged moment on
the whole complex hoax!

Very good work, all involved.

Just one question... are we 100% sure that the 2006 picture was officially released by AEG as being from the rehearsal?

annieisnotokey wrote:Just one question... are we 100% sure that the 2006 picture was officially released by AEG as being from the rehearsal?

Is exactly what Im saying for us to do: ask the website who supposedly published an article back 3 years ago about Blaine and Mike, and if the picture displayed there with him wearing the Smooth Criminal Hat and jacket, above the red shirt, had not got any update aftwards on the page...Cause if it does not the picture published there is the same back 3 years ago...Annie dear Anie...We had debunked AEG, since AEG will be giving us old pics, instead of real ones.Being this the main reason, perhaps, to have just that only one video footage...So right now, what we need to do, is contact them and ask if the image on their site was the
original!If it is...So THIS IS NOT IT!

neverlandsfairy wrote:

annieisnotokey wrote:Just one question... are we 100% sure that the 2006 picture was officially released by AEG as being from the rehearsal?

Is exactly what Im saying for us to do: ask the website who supposedly
published an article back 3 years ago about Blaine and Mike, and if the
picture displayed there with him wearing the Smooth Criminal Hat
and jacket, above the red shirt, had not got any update aftwards on the page...Cause if it does not the picture published there is the
same back 3 years ago...Annie dear Anie...We had debunked AEG, since
AEG will be giving us old pics, instead of real ones.Being this the main reason, perhaps, to
have just that only one video footage...So right now, what we need to
do, is contact them and ask if the image on their site was the
original!If it is...So THIS IS NOT IT!

Gotcha!

I just emailed absolute pictures...Now lets wait and hope for:

First:they answer my mail.
Second:For they to say the article never got any update recently, or after 2006...(Prayin hard for it!)

So lets cross fingers!!!Cause if they did not never edited, updated, changed...

THIS IS "NOT" IT.

nice find...
woah.

Now we finally got an explanation why the dancer once said on a tweet that: THIS IS NOT IT, cause seems indeed never had any THIS IS IT!And why Mike was looking younger, and with round ear, cause simply, he was 3 years younger O.o!All this prior Klein work back on his nose!

If the Michael with the rounded ear was from 3 years ago in 2006 and he now has a mangled ear in 2009 - how do you explain the fact that he also has rounded ears in 2009?

[quote="Another.Part.Of.Me"]Now we finally got an explanation why the dancer once said on a tweet that: THIS IS NOT IT, cause seems indeed never had any THIS IS IT!And why Mike was looking younger, and with round ear, cause simply, he was 3 years younger O.o!All this prior Klein work back on his nose!

If the Michael with the rounded ear was from 3 years ago in 2006 and he now has a mangled ear in 2009 - how do you explain the fact that he also has rounded ears in 2009?

APOM Im as lost as everyone, but somehow if the article was really published on 2006 without any update, it can be e a proof.I also believe on the decoys role, and the point ear and etc.Im not saying he did not used them, but that would explain why on the video he appears with it round, after supposedly had got mangled .Tough I think he used impersonators during this year, after get Dr.Klein working on him.I dont know if you understood, what Im trying to say?

But the most important thing is not just about the ear, is :if the picture was really taken on 2006, also it means the dancers were hired back that year too, instead of what we believe on march...Being the audiction of march a kind of "staged" selection.

So to get the straight answer, to debunk or confirm it, we need their reply to my mail.Lets hope they answer, and if they do, the article had not suffered any modification after november 21/2006.

Apom Im here most like just to read the investigation finders, and Im really impressed with your work, so this is my tiny contribution.And Im really crossing fingers for they to answer.And the answer to be what im expecting...Tough if its not, at least I´d had tried to help somehow... :D

erm.. okay.. the link doesnt want to work... so u have to copy and paste it in.. my whole post disappeared when i posted it lol

http://web.archive.org/web/*/absolutepictures.com/news.php?id=1042

theres no picture, only an ad that doesnt show up. the whole website looks different so i guess they changed their site somewhen and added the picture then...

http://www.absolutepictures.com/news.php?id=1042

This is the link ,the picture is on the left side of the article, I.Demon.Is it the same one you are talking about?

No, im talking about this webarchive: http://www.archive.org/index.php
it saves websites from time to time and you can see there what they looked like in the past. and if you search for that articel you come up with the url i posted and that doesnt work as a link.
theres one entry from 17. Dec. 2007 about the article, look it up, the picture isnt there =/

I see what you meant.Anyway as I said it was just my tiny contribution, cause I found a bit odd the article with an old picture.Tough Im still waiting their answer.Ty for your hint I.D