Taj Jackson in charge of estate in "secret" deal..

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/610450/Taj-Jackson-in-charge-of-estate.html

Notice the interesting comments from taj:

The singer - who lived at Neverland in the 90s - had planned to work on a
movie project after the This It Is tour.
Taj said: "He had his next chapter mapped out.
"He wanted to do this and get on to directing. The last words he said to me
were, 'We're gong to do film after this.'"

Who is Taj Jackson - is it a relation?

Very interesting though - I wonder what the movie project was?!

Taj is Michael Jackson's nephew. He is Tito's son

KPNUTS wrote:Who is Taj Jackson - is it a relation?

Taj is his nephew,Tito's son

I hope this is true. I've always believed a Jackson of some sort should have a say or seat at the table in what happens with Michaels assets. Taj worked for Michael over the last year or so and went to court testify that Michael would not of been in support of the memorabilia exhibit. I think personally the will is fraudlent, so the compromise is good. I know some here think Branca is working with Michael, but he's been pretty shifty in the past and was not their in support of Michael during the 2005 molestation trial. Anyway just my opinion. Could be wrong. I found 2 articles on this from another site. Not sure what to make of it, but they do make sense.

ARTICLE BELOW
CONNECTING THE DOTS: THE WILL, JOHN BRANCA AND MOTTOLA


“Michael Jackson Terminated Branca as his Attorney
on February 3, 2003. Michael Jackson terminated
John Branca as his attorney on February 3, 2003,
in a written termination letter. (Exhibit “A”).
Michael Jackson instructed Branca in writing to
resign from all positions he had in Michael
Jackson’s personal and business life . Branca
failed to follow Michael Ja ckson’s instructions,
but still remains obligated to comply with those
instructions and resign as Executor.

“On February 3, 2003, Michael Jackson instructed Branca
to turn over to his new attorneys all records, files,
and papers dealing with his personal and business life.
While Branca turned over his other files, Branca secretly
refused to turn over the purported July 7, 2002, Will,
and March 2002, Trust. In violation of his fiduciary duties,
Branca concealed the Will and concealed his refusal to
resign as Executor. Branca’s concealment of the Will and
failure to resign continued for many years despite Michael
Jackson’s numerous demands Branca turn over all documents
and resign from all positions. Branca’s conduct is an ethical
violation this Court should not permit.

“Michael Jackson Terminated John Branca because of Embezzlement.
In 2003, Michael Jackson launched an investigation into Branca’s
embezzlement activities regarding Michel Jackson’s money.

The investigators, the firm of Interfor in New York,
reported in February, March, and with a final report on
April 15, 2003, there was an improper relationship between
Tommy Mattola and John Branca whereby Branca and Matolla
were illegally funneling Michael Jackson’s money to off-shore
accounts in the Caribbean. (Exhibit “B”).

The Interfor Report caused Michael Jackson great anger,
and Michael Jackson demanded Branca never have anything
to do with him, his business, his family, or his personal
life again. Michael Jackson terminated John Branca because
of his belief that Branca had committed crimes against him.
Branca never accounted to Michael Jackson regarding his conduct,
nor disclosed his books and records to Michael Jackson.

“Whether it was true or false that Branca had embezzled money
[from] Michael Jackson, Michael Jackson’s belief that it
occurred was the basis for Branca’s termination, and Branca
never complied with Michael Jackson’s demands he account and resign.

A conflicts [sic] of interest exists between John Branca
and the Estate of Michael Jackson. It would be grossly
negligent for any Executor of the Estate of Michael
Jackson to ignore the investigator’s report concerning Branca.

However, Branca has undertaken no investigation of his
own financial transactions with Michael Jackson,
nor will he do so because of his conflicts of interest.
He has willfully concealed from this Court the reasons
for his termination, and he has willfully concealed form
the Court Michael Jackson’s belief that Branca’s embezzled money….

“Michael Jackson was not in Los Angeles on July 7, 2002.
On July 7, 2002, Michael Jackson was in New York City,
and he was not in Los Angeles at 5:00 p.m. to sign the
purported Will as the Will recites. Branca and McClain
have concealed form this Court the material fact that
Michael Jackson did not sign the purported July 7, 2002,
Will as they have claimed repeatedly under penalty of perjury.

Their concealment of this information [from] the Court
is a fraud on the Court and disqualifies them form being
Executors of the Estate […] McClain had a duty to inform
the Court Michael Jackson was not in Los Angeles on July 7, 2002.
They concealed that fact from this Court.

Branca and McClain have violated their fiduciary
duties by testifying under penalty of perjury
on at least seventeen (17) times the purported
July 7, 2002, Will was correct.”

Judge Beckloff threw this entire document out,
along with all the compelling evidence as to its veracity.

He didn’t consider it at all;
apparently not even giving it a second thought.

By Dr. Firpo Carr
Los Angeles Sentinel Newspaper
November 12 - 18, 2009

Here's the 2nd part regarding Branca and Weitzmans deals with the Cobain Estate. I know Courtney is a bit of a nutter, but what she says in her tweets sounds worthy enough to be considered IMO.

"WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE COBAIN ESTATE"



http://m.twitter.com/courtneylover79 COURTNEY'S TWEETS HAVE BEEN MOVED APPARENTLY GO HERE Click here: badonkaduncan.
http://drumsandguns.livejournal.com/

Fight for it to be, i trusted my alwyer our laywer rosemary liek i trusted my lawyer Howard Weitzman like i trusted my lawyer John Branca 34 minutes ago from web

Kurts estate and his daughters trust and all of my monies Hole and Nirvana have been diverted to weitzman and branca now jacksons estate 18 minutes ago from web

now any smart musician knows you never EVER sell publishing whatsoever, but weitman who oozes so much charm for such a tiny fella 13 minutes ago from web

certainly no frances's at one time Weitzman in 05 had me believeing i had no choice but to sell some publishing of kurt 14 minutes ago from web

AND THERE'S MUCH MORE.
QUESTION HERE IS: WILL BRANCA/WEITZMAN TAKE ALL IN THE MICHAEL JACKSON ESTATE. WHAT WILL BECOME OF THE SONY/ATV CATALOG?? DO THEY HAVE A PLAN??

THE JUDGE IN THE THE MICHAEL JACKSON ESTATE PROBATE CASE NEEDS TO SEE/HEAR THE EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY OXMAN.
ONCE AGAIN THEIR (JACKSON'S) BACKS ARE UP AGAINST THE WALL

THE JACKSON'S NEED TO FIGHT. THEY NEED OUR SUPPORT.

I am really happy to hear that about Taj...MJ is very close to his nephews.

I've heard that about Branca too, and I don't know what to believe. I hope he has MJ's best interests at heart. It seems strange that he wouldn't have updated his will if this is the case. I'm not sure I'd believe anything Firpo Carr says either.

if you guys re gonna take the articles from mj hoax live
you should at least give them credit.

weve been all over this for awhile.


thanks